Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Oct; 36(5):555-9.AN

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without a posterior mucosal flap and to compare the surgical success rates of that procedure in patients with a nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the results of 78 endoscopic endonasal DCRs performed at the Baskent University, Department of Otolaryngology between December 2000 and March 2007 on 74 patients with a lacrimal obstruction. The patients were divided into two groups. During surgery, the posterior mucosal flap was preserved in 27 patients (group A) and removed in 47 patients (group B). All patients underwent intubation with a silicone tube at the conclusion of surgery. The silicone tube was removed within 6 months after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 36 months (range, 2-78 months). The results obtained were then compared.

RESULTS

Granulation tissue and synechia developed between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in one patient in group A (revision surgery was not required). In group B, granulation tissue at the rhinostomy opening was found in seven patients, and in four of those subjects, the granulation tissue obstructed the neo-ostium. These four patients underwent a second operation. In group B, synechia was noted between the middle turbinate and the lateral nasal wall in two of 47 patients. In group A, the procedure was successful for all patients except one in whom granulation tissue developed, and in group B, the surgical success rate was 88.3%.

CONCLUSION

In endoscopic endonasal DCR, the closure of bare bone with a posteriorly based nasal mucosal flap that creates an anastomosis between the lacrimal sac mucosa and the nasal mucosa decreases the formation of granulation tissue. But, there is no significant difference of success rate between two groups.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. leylakansu@hotmail.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19297108

Citation

Kansu, Leyla, et al. "Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy With or Without Mucosal Flaps." Auris, Nasus, Larynx, vol. 36, no. 5, 2009, pp. 555-9.
Kansu L, Aydin E, Avci S, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(5):555-9.
Kansu, L., Aydin, E., Avci, S., Kal, A., & Gedik, S. (2009). Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps. Auris, Nasus, Larynx, 36(5), 555-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2009.01.005
Kansu L, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy With or Without Mucosal Flaps. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(5):555-9. PubMed PMID: 19297108.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps. AU - Kansu,Leyla, AU - Aydin,Erdinc, AU - Avci,Suat, AU - Kal,Ali, AU - Gedik,Sansal, Y1 - 2009/03/17/ PY - 2008/05/22/received PY - 2008/12/29/revised PY - 2009/01/10/accepted PY - 2009/3/20/entrez PY - 2009/3/20/pubmed PY - 2009/12/18/medline SP - 555 EP - 9 JF - Auris, nasus, larynx JO - Auris Nasus Larynx VL - 36 IS - 5 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without a posterior mucosal flap and to compare the surgical success rates of that procedure in patients with a nasolacrimal duct obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the results of 78 endoscopic endonasal DCRs performed at the Baskent University, Department of Otolaryngology between December 2000 and March 2007 on 74 patients with a lacrimal obstruction. The patients were divided into two groups. During surgery, the posterior mucosal flap was preserved in 27 patients (group A) and removed in 47 patients (group B). All patients underwent intubation with a silicone tube at the conclusion of surgery. The silicone tube was removed within 6 months after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 36 months (range, 2-78 months). The results obtained were then compared. RESULTS: Granulation tissue and synechia developed between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in one patient in group A (revision surgery was not required). In group B, granulation tissue at the rhinostomy opening was found in seven patients, and in four of those subjects, the granulation tissue obstructed the neo-ostium. These four patients underwent a second operation. In group B, synechia was noted between the middle turbinate and the lateral nasal wall in two of 47 patients. In group A, the procedure was successful for all patients except one in whom granulation tissue developed, and in group B, the surgical success rate was 88.3%. CONCLUSION: In endoscopic endonasal DCR, the closure of bare bone with a posteriorly based nasal mucosal flap that creates an anastomosis between the lacrimal sac mucosa and the nasal mucosa decreases the formation of granulation tissue. But, there is no significant difference of success rate between two groups. SN - 1879-1476 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19297108/Comparison_of_surgical_outcomes_of_endonasal_dacryocystorhinostomy_with_or_without_mucosal_flaps_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0385-8146(09)00008-X DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -