Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[The observe of clinical effect of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by bone setting manipulation of different directions].
Zhongguo Gu Shang 2009; 22(4):255-8ZG

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect between lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

METHODS

Two hundred and nine patients of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, male 131, female 78, the age from 20 to 79 years old, 58 cases of all these patients age above 50. According to diagnosis the ladder of the 92 cases bulging type, 69 hernia type, 48 cases free type. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group (107 cases) and control group (102 cases). All the patients were treated with the three-dimensional computer-controlled traction therapeutic apparatus, with continued traction for 30 minutes. After traction, lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation were respectively adopted in treatment group and control group (on alternate days one time, 3 times as a course of treatment). The symptoms and signs (including back pain and discomfort, lower limb pain and numbness, powerless urination and defecation, numbness in perineum, straight-leg raising degree, ability of lower extremity walking, work and live) of patients were observed after treatment.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up from 1 to 6 months with an average of 3.2 months. After treatment, the symptoms and signs of patients have markedly improved (P < 0.01), but the lower back pain and discomfort, lower limb walking ability in treatment group were better than control group (P < 0.05). According therapeutic criteria, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.01). In cases with bulging type, 47 in treatment group and 45 in control group, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.05); in cases with hernia type, 35 in treatment group and 34 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05); in cases of free type, 25 in treatment group and 23 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The global effect of lumbar backwards flexion manipulation was satisfactory than rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. But rotating manipulation suited to free type.

Authors+Show Affiliations

The Third Clinical Medical College ofZhejiang TCM University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China. lvlj0288@sina.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

chi

PubMed ID

19408748

Citation

Lü, Li-jiang, et al. "[The Observe of Clinical Effect of Treating Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation By Bone Setting Manipulation of Different Directions]." Zhongguo Gu Shang = China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 22, no. 4, 2009, pp. 255-8.
Lü LJ, Jin YD, Zheng RY, et al. [The observe of clinical effect of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by bone setting manipulation of different directions]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009;22(4):255-8.
Lü, L. J., Jin, Y. D., Zheng, R. Y., Fan, B. H., Yang, M. X., Ying, X. M., ... Zhang, W. B. (2009). [The observe of clinical effect of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by bone setting manipulation of different directions]. Zhongguo Gu Shang = China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 22(4), pp. 255-8.
Lü LJ, et al. [The Observe of Clinical Effect of Treating Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation By Bone Setting Manipulation of Different Directions]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009;22(4):255-8. PubMed PMID: 19408748.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [The observe of clinical effect of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by bone setting manipulation of different directions]. AU - Lü,Li-jiang, AU - Jin,Ye-dao, AU - Zheng,Ru-yun, AU - Fan,Bing-hua, AU - Yang,Mi-xiong, AU - Ying,Xiao-ming, AU - Wang,Qi-Kai, AU - Zhang,Wen-bo, PY - 2009/5/5/entrez PY - 2009/5/5/pubmed PY - 2009/9/23/medline SP - 255 EP - 8 JF - Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology JO - Zhongguo Gu Shang VL - 22 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect between lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, male 131, female 78, the age from 20 to 79 years old, 58 cases of all these patients age above 50. According to diagnosis the ladder of the 92 cases bulging type, 69 hernia type, 48 cases free type. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group (107 cases) and control group (102 cases). All the patients were treated with the three-dimensional computer-controlled traction therapeutic apparatus, with continued traction for 30 minutes. After traction, lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation were respectively adopted in treatment group and control group (on alternate days one time, 3 times as a course of treatment). The symptoms and signs (including back pain and discomfort, lower limb pain and numbness, powerless urination and defecation, numbness in perineum, straight-leg raising degree, ability of lower extremity walking, work and live) of patients were observed after treatment. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up from 1 to 6 months with an average of 3.2 months. After treatment, the symptoms and signs of patients have markedly improved (P < 0.01), but the lower back pain and discomfort, lower limb walking ability in treatment group were better than control group (P < 0.05). According therapeutic criteria, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.01). In cases with bulging type, 47 in treatment group and 45 in control group, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.05); in cases with hernia type, 35 in treatment group and 34 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05); in cases of free type, 25 in treatment group and 23 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The global effect of lumbar backwards flexion manipulation was satisfactory than rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. But rotating manipulation suited to free type. SN - 1003-0034 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19408748/[The_observe_of_clinical_effect_of_treating_lumbar_intervertebral_disc_herniation_by_bone_setting_manipulation_of_different_directions]_ L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/herniateddisk.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -