Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: comparison with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a population sample.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-30.AN

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a widely used self-report screening instrument for the detection of bipolar disorder in clinical populations. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the reliability of this instrument.

METHODS

Screening results using the MDQ were compared with results obtained using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Research Version, Non-patient edition (SCID) in a community-based sample of 1066 women. Trained personnel, who were blind to the results of the MDQ screen, conducted clinical interviews.

RESULTS

Using the MDQ, 21 women screened positive for bipolar disorder, and using the SCID diagnoses, 24 women were confirmed with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Six women were detected on both instruments. Compared to the SCID, the sensitivity for the MDQ was 25%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 28%, negative predictive value 98%, and a demonstrated kappa of 0.25. The MDQ failed to detect any of the 11 participants in the study with bipolar II disorder and missed seven of 13 participants with bipolar I disorder or bipolar not otherwise specified. Of the 21 women who screened positive using the MDQ, 19 had current or past psychopathologies other than bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSION

The MDQ has substantial limitations for detection of bipolar disorder, in particular bipolar II disorder, in non-clinical populations.

Authors+Show Affiliations

University of Melbourne, Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia. seetald@barwonhealth.org.auNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19440884

Citation

Dodd, Seetal, et al. "Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Comparison With the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a Population Sample." The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 6, 2009, pp. 526-30.
Dodd S, Williams LJ, Jacka FN, et al. Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: comparison with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a population sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(6):526-30.
Dodd, S., Williams, L. J., Jacka, F. N., Pasco, J. A., Bjerkeset, O., & Berk, M. (2009). Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: comparison with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a population sample. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(6), 526-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670902873706
Dodd S, et al. Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Comparison With the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a Population Sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(6):526-30. PubMed PMID: 19440884.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: comparison with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a population sample. AU - Dodd,Seetal, AU - Williams,Lana J, AU - Jacka,Felice N, AU - Pasco,Julie A, AU - Bjerkeset,Ottar, AU - Berk,Michael, PY - 2009/5/15/entrez PY - 2009/5/15/pubmed PY - 2009/8/29/medline SP - 526 EP - 30 JF - The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry JO - Aust N Z J Psychiatry VL - 43 IS - 6 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a widely used self-report screening instrument for the detection of bipolar disorder in clinical populations. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the reliability of this instrument. METHODS: Screening results using the MDQ were compared with results obtained using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Research Version, Non-patient edition (SCID) in a community-based sample of 1066 women. Trained personnel, who were blind to the results of the MDQ screen, conducted clinical interviews. RESULTS: Using the MDQ, 21 women screened positive for bipolar disorder, and using the SCID diagnoses, 24 women were confirmed with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Six women were detected on both instruments. Compared to the SCID, the sensitivity for the MDQ was 25%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 28%, negative predictive value 98%, and a demonstrated kappa of 0.25. The MDQ failed to detect any of the 11 participants in the study with bipolar II disorder and missed seven of 13 participants with bipolar I disorder or bipolar not otherwise specified. Of the 21 women who screened positive using the MDQ, 19 had current or past psychopathologies other than bipolar disorder. CONCLUSION: The MDQ has substantial limitations for detection of bipolar disorder, in particular bipolar II disorder, in non-clinical populations. SN - 1440-1614 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19440884/Reliability_of_the_Mood_Disorder_Questionnaire:_comparison_with_the_Structured_Clinical_Interview_for_the_DSM_IV_TR_in_a_population_sample_ L2 - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00048670902873706?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -