Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Rethinking suicide bombing.
Crisis. 2009; 30(2):94-7.C

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current issues in the emerging psychiatric literature on suicide bombing tend to center around the pathologies of suicide bombers and the role of psychiatry as an adequate tool for analysis.

AIMS

Attention to broader social science research may allow mental health professionals to develop more accurate models of behavior to explain and possibly prevent future attacks.

METHODS

The psychiatric literature on suicide bombing was reviewed and compared to similar anthropological literature.

RESULTS

A probe into the methodologies of researching suicide bombing, definitions of "war" and "terrorism", and beliefs on life, death, homicide, and suicide demonstrate that most of the psychiatric literature reflects a particular perspective which aspires towards a certain universalism.

CONCLUSIONS

Anthropological approaches can disclose standpoints taken for granted since any interventions with respect to suicide bombing must eventually account for values which are ultimately culturally determined.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. neil.k.aggarwal@gmail.com

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19525169

Citation

Aggarwal, Neil. "Rethinking Suicide Bombing." Crisis, vol. 30, no. 2, 2009, pp. 94-7.
Aggarwal N. Rethinking suicide bombing. Crisis. 2009;30(2):94-7.
Aggarwal, N. (2009). Rethinking suicide bombing. Crisis, 30(2), 94-7. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.2.94
Aggarwal N. Rethinking Suicide Bombing. Crisis. 2009;30(2):94-7. PubMed PMID: 19525169.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Rethinking suicide bombing. A1 - Aggarwal,Neil, PY - 2009/6/16/entrez PY - 2009/6/16/pubmed PY - 2009/7/14/medline SP - 94 EP - 7 JF - Crisis JO - Crisis VL - 30 IS - 2 N2 - BACKGROUND: Current issues in the emerging psychiatric literature on suicide bombing tend to center around the pathologies of suicide bombers and the role of psychiatry as an adequate tool for analysis. AIMS: Attention to broader social science research may allow mental health professionals to develop more accurate models of behavior to explain and possibly prevent future attacks. METHODS: The psychiatric literature on suicide bombing was reviewed and compared to similar anthropological literature. RESULTS: A probe into the methodologies of researching suicide bombing, definitions of "war" and "terrorism", and beliefs on life, death, homicide, and suicide demonstrate that most of the psychiatric literature reflects a particular perspective which aspires towards a certain universalism. CONCLUSIONS: Anthropological approaches can disclose standpoints taken for granted since any interventions with respect to suicide bombing must eventually account for values which are ultimately culturally determined. SN - 0227-5910 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19525169/Rethinking_suicide_bombing_ L2 - https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/0227-5910.30.2.94?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -