Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.
Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct; 29(5):1221-31.R

Abstract

Over the past decade, the level of interest in improving the quality of healthcare in the United States has increased. New requirements established by regulatory organizations require the ongoing practice-based evaluation of physician performance. Peer review, a key process in physician performance evaluation, is geared primarily toward measuring diagnostic accuracy. Accuracy may be measured in terms of interpretive agreement or disagreement during a blinded double reading or in workstation-integrated evaluations. Each method of assessing diagnostic accuracy has strengths and weaknesses that should be carefully considered before it is implemented in a particular departmental or institutional setting.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19564252

Citation

Mahgerefteh, Shmuel, et al. "Peer Review in Diagnostic Radiology: Current State and a Vision for the Future." Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, vol. 29, no. 5, 2009, pp. 1221-31.
Mahgerefteh S, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, et al. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1221-31.
Mahgerefteh, S., Kruskal, J. B., Yam, C. S., Blachar, A., & Sosna, J. (2009). Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 29(5), 1221-31. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.295095086
Mahgerefteh S, et al. Peer Review in Diagnostic Radiology: Current State and a Vision for the Future. Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1221-31. PubMed PMID: 19564252.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. AU - Mahgerefteh,Shmuel, AU - Kruskal,Jonathan B, AU - Yam,Chun S, AU - Blachar,Arye, AU - Sosna,Jacob, Y1 - 2009/06/29/ PY - 2009/7/1/entrez PY - 2009/7/1/pubmed PY - 2009/10/16/medline SP - 1221 EP - 31 JF - Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc JO - Radiographics VL - 29 IS - 5 N2 - Over the past decade, the level of interest in improving the quality of healthcare in the United States has increased. New requirements established by regulatory organizations require the ongoing practice-based evaluation of physician performance. Peer review, a key process in physician performance evaluation, is geared primarily toward measuring diagnostic accuracy. Accuracy may be measured in terms of interpretive agreement or disagreement during a blinded double reading or in workstation-integrated evaluations. Each method of assessing diagnostic accuracy has strengths and weaknesses that should be carefully considered before it is implemented in a particular departmental or institutional setting. SN - 1527-1323 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19564252/Peer_review_in_diagnostic_radiology:_current_state_and_a_vision_for_the_future_ L2 - http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.295095086?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -