Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
PM R. 2009 Jan; 1(1):14-22.PM R

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy.

METHODS

A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19627868

Citation

England, J D., et al. "Practice Parameter: the Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: the Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (an Evidence-based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation." PM & R : the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 14-22.
England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, et al. Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. PM R. 2009;1(1):14-22.
England, J. D., Gronseth, G. S., Franklin, G., Carter, G. T., Kinsella, L. J., Cohen, J. A., Asbury, A. K., Szigeti, K., Lupski, J. R., Latov, N., Lewis, R. A., Low, P. A., Fisher, M. A., Herrmann, D., Howard, J. F., Lauria, G., Miller, R. G., Polydefkis, M., & Sumner, A. J. (2009). Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. PM & R : the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation, 1(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.11.011
England JD, et al. Practice Parameter: the Evaluation of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy: the Role of Autonomic Testing, Nerve Biopsy, and Skin Biopsy (an Evidence-based Review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. PM R. 2009;1(1):14-22. PubMed PMID: 19627868.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. AU - England,J D, AU - Gronseth,G S, AU - Franklin,G, AU - Carter,G T, AU - Kinsella,L J, AU - Cohen,J A, AU - Asbury,A K, AU - Szigeti,K, AU - Lupski,J R, AU - Latov,N, AU - Lewis,R A, AU - Low,P A, AU - Fisher,M A, AU - Herrmann,D, AU - Howard,J F, AU - Lauria,G, AU - Miller,R G, AU - Polydefkis,M, AU - Sumner,A J, AU - ,, AU - ,, AU - ,, PY - 2008/11/24/received PY - 2008/11/24/accepted PY - 2009/7/25/entrez PY - 2009/7/25/pubmed PY - 2009/9/30/medline SP - 14 EP - 22 JF - PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation JO - PM R VL - 1 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy. SN - 1934-1482 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19627868/Practice_parameter:_the_evaluation_of_distal_symmetric_polyneuropathy:_the_role_of_autonomic_testing_nerve_biopsy_and_skin_biopsy__an_evidence_based_review___Report_of_the_American_Academy_of_Neurology_the_American_Association_of_Neuromuscular_and_Electrodiagnostic_Medicine_and_the_American_Academy_of_Physical_Medicine_and_Rehabilitation_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1934-1482(08)00037-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -