Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.
J Dent. 2010 Jan; 38(1):16-22.JD

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was a preliminary evaluation of two minimal preparation designs proposed for ceramic and composite resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. It compared the structural integrity and fracture mode of teeth restored with traditionally and minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns fabricated from the same material hypothesizing that teeth restored with minimal resin bonded crowns would demonstrate the same fracture strength to teeth restored with traditional resin bonded crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty intact maxillary molar teeth were used and divided in four groups. Two groups were prepared according to a traditional crown preparation design and two groups were prepared according to minimal preparation designs. A resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) and a leucite glass-ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used for the fabrication of the crowns using CEREC Scan. Crowns of ceramic were cemented using Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent) and crowns of composite with Rely X Unicem Aplicap (3M ESPE) and loaded until fracture. Load data was analysed using ANOVA comparing crowns of the same restorative material. The mode of fracture was also recorded and analysed (Kruskal-Wallis).

RESULTS

For the composite system the mean fracture load and SD was 1682N (+/-315) for the traditional and 1751N (+/-338) for the minimal crowns. For the ceramic system the mean fracture load and SD was 1512N (+/-373) for the traditional and 1837 (+/-356) for the minimal crowns. No statistically significant difference was found between the two designs for each system. Nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) of the fracture mode showed no statistical significant difference between designs for either material (p>.05).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this experimental design, it was found that minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC crowns demonstrated equal fracture resistance and mode of fracture to that of crowns bonded to traditionally prepared teeth.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Adult Dental Care, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, S10 2TA, Sheffield, UK. e.tsitrou@gmail.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19683378

Citation

Tsitrou, Effrosyni A., et al. "A Preliminary Evaluation of the Structural Integrity and Fracture Mode of Minimally Prepared Resin Bonded CAD/CAM Crowns." Journal of Dentistry, vol. 38, no. 1, 2010, pp. 16-22.
Tsitrou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, van Noort R. A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent. 2010;38(1):16-22.
Tsitrou, E. A., Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, M., & van Noort, R. (2010). A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. Journal of Dentistry, 38(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.003
Tsitrou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, van Noort R. A Preliminary Evaluation of the Structural Integrity and Fracture Mode of Minimally Prepared Resin Bonded CAD/CAM Crowns. J Dent. 2010;38(1):16-22. PubMed PMID: 19683378.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. AU - Tsitrou,Effrosyni A, AU - Helvatjoglu-Antoniades,Maria, AU - van Noort,Richard, PY - 2008/11/03/received PY - 2009/07/05/revised PY - 2009/07/10/accepted PY - 2009/8/18/entrez PY - 2009/8/18/pubmed PY - 2010/3/24/medline SP - 16 EP - 22 JF - Journal of dentistry JO - J Dent VL - 38 IS - 1 N2 - PURPOSE: This study was a preliminary evaluation of two minimal preparation designs proposed for ceramic and composite resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. It compared the structural integrity and fracture mode of teeth restored with traditionally and minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns fabricated from the same material hypothesizing that teeth restored with minimal resin bonded crowns would demonstrate the same fracture strength to teeth restored with traditional resin bonded crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty intact maxillary molar teeth were used and divided in four groups. Two groups were prepared according to a traditional crown preparation design and two groups were prepared according to minimal preparation designs. A resin composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) and a leucite glass-ceramic (ProCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used for the fabrication of the crowns using CEREC Scan. Crowns of ceramic were cemented using Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent) and crowns of composite with Rely X Unicem Aplicap (3M ESPE) and loaded until fracture. Load data was analysed using ANOVA comparing crowns of the same restorative material. The mode of fracture was also recorded and analysed (Kruskal-Wallis). RESULTS: For the composite system the mean fracture load and SD was 1682N (+/-315) for the traditional and 1751N (+/-338) for the minimal crowns. For the ceramic system the mean fracture load and SD was 1512N (+/-373) for the traditional and 1837 (+/-356) for the minimal crowns. No statistically significant difference was found between the two designs for each system. Nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) of the fracture mode showed no statistical significant difference between designs for either material (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this experimental design, it was found that minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC crowns demonstrated equal fracture resistance and mode of fracture to that of crowns bonded to traditionally prepared teeth. SN - 1879-176X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19683378/A_preliminary_evaluation_of_the_structural_integrity_and_fracture_mode_of_minimally_prepared_resin_bonded_CAD/CAM_crowns_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300-5712(09)00178-X DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -