Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5.A&A

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many manufacturers are producing videolaryngoscopes (VLSs) with differing specifications, user interfaces, and geometry. It is clinically relevant to know the relative performance of the blades. Visualization of the glottis and intubation are often problematic in (extremely) obese patients, and the new video technology may offer better functionality and performance. Although many tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy are performed with an unstyletted endotracheal tube, it is recommended to use a stylet for intubation using videolaryngoscopy. In this study, we compared 3 VLSs in morbidly obese patients undergoing intubation for elective surgery and tested whether it is feasible to intubate the tracheas of morbidly obese patients without using a stylet.

METHODS

One hundred fifty consecutive adult morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35 kg/m(2)) were randomly selected to receive one of 3 VLSs: GlideScope, Storz V-Mac, and McGrath. Direct laryngoscopy scored the best possible view of the glottis; subsequently, the respective VLS was used, and the patient's trachea was intubated. Common preprocedural (e.g., Mallampati grade) and intraprocedural (Cormack-Lehane grade) metrics of intubation difficulty were measured, as well as the dependent variables of intubation time, number of attempts, and subjective difficulty.

RESULTS

All 3 VLSs tested offered an equal or better view of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy. The number of attempts necessary to intubate the trachea differed significantly among VLSs (average 2.6 +/- 1.0 attempts for the GlideScope, 1.4 +/- 0.7 for the Storz, and 2.9 +/- 0.9 for the McGrath VLS). The average intubation times were 33 +/- 18 s for the GlideScope, 17 +/- 9 s for the Storz, and 41 +/- 25 s for the McGrath VLS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the VLS with the Macintosh blade (Storz VLS) had a better overall satisfaction score, intubation time, number of intubation attempts, and necessity of extra adjuncts, compared with the 2 other tested devices.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19713258

Citation

Maassen, Ralph, et al. "A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients." Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 109, no. 5, 2009, pp. 1560-5.
Maassen R, Lee R, Hermans B, et al. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(5):1560-5.
Maassen, R., Lee, R., Hermans, B., Marcus, M., & van Zundert, A. (2009). A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 109(5), 1560-5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a
Maassen R, et al. A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(5):1560-5. PubMed PMID: 19713258.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. AU - Maassen,Ralph, AU - Lee,Ruben, AU - Hermans,Boukje, AU - Marcus,Marco, AU - van Zundert,André, Y1 - 2009/08/27/ PY - 2009/8/29/entrez PY - 2009/8/29/pubmed PY - 2009/11/6/medline SP - 1560 EP - 5 JF - Anesthesia and analgesia JO - Anesth. Analg. VL - 109 IS - 5 N2 - BACKGROUND: Many manufacturers are producing videolaryngoscopes (VLSs) with differing specifications, user interfaces, and geometry. It is clinically relevant to know the relative performance of the blades. Visualization of the glottis and intubation are often problematic in (extremely) obese patients, and the new video technology may offer better functionality and performance. Although many tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy are performed with an unstyletted endotracheal tube, it is recommended to use a stylet for intubation using videolaryngoscopy. In this study, we compared 3 VLSs in morbidly obese patients undergoing intubation for elective surgery and tested whether it is feasible to intubate the tracheas of morbidly obese patients without using a stylet. METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive adult morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35 kg/m(2)) were randomly selected to receive one of 3 VLSs: GlideScope, Storz V-Mac, and McGrath. Direct laryngoscopy scored the best possible view of the glottis; subsequently, the respective VLS was used, and the patient's trachea was intubated. Common preprocedural (e.g., Mallampati grade) and intraprocedural (Cormack-Lehane grade) metrics of intubation difficulty were measured, as well as the dependent variables of intubation time, number of attempts, and subjective difficulty. RESULTS: All 3 VLSs tested offered an equal or better view of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy. The number of attempts necessary to intubate the trachea differed significantly among VLSs (average 2.6 +/- 1.0 attempts for the GlideScope, 1.4 +/- 0.7 for the Storz, and 2.9 +/- 0.9 for the McGrath VLS). The average intubation times were 33 +/- 18 s for the GlideScope, 17 +/- 9 s for the Storz, and 41 +/- 25 s for the McGrath VLS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the VLS with the Macintosh blade (Storz VLS) had a better overall satisfaction score, intubation time, number of intubation attempts, and necessity of extra adjuncts, compared with the 2 other tested devices. SN - 1526-7598 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19713258/A_comparison_of_three_videolaryngoscopes:_the_Macintosh_laryngoscope_blade_reduces_but_does_not_replace_routine_stylet_use_for_intubation_in_morbidly_obese_patients_ L2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -