Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Dec; 24(10):842-9.CB

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-flexion knee replacements have been developed to accommodate a large range of flexion (>120 degrees) after total knee arthroplasty. Both posterior cruciate ligament retaining and sacrificing high-flexion knee designs have been marketed. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a cruciate-retaining high-flexion knee replacement. Furthermore, the mechanical behaviour of this high-flexion knee replacement was compared to both a cruciate-retaining conventional and a posterior-stabilized high-flexion knee replacement.

METHODS

A finite element prosthetic knee model was developed to analyze the mechanical performance of the knee designs evaluated in this study. Polyethylene stresses and the amount of femoral rollback were studied during a squatting movement (flexion <or=150 degrees).

FINDINGS

During deep knee flexion, the cruciate-retaining high-flexion design demonstrated a lower peak tibio-femoral contact stress (74.7 MPa) than the cruciate-retaining conventional design (96.5 MPa). The posterior-stabilized high-flexion design showed the lowest peak tibio-femoral contact stress at the condylar articulation (54.2 MPa), although the post was loaded higher (77.4 MPa). The knee designs analyzed in this study produced a similar amount of femoral rollback during normal knee flexion (flexion > 120 degrees), whereas the cruciate-retaining designs showed a paradoxical anterior movement of the femoral condyles during high-flexion (flexion>120 degrees).

INTERPRETATION

The current study demonstrates a cruciate-retaining high-flexion knee replacement produces a lower prosthetic load than a conventional cruciate-retaining replacement during deep knee flexion. Compared to a posterior-stabilized high-flexion design, the cruciate-retaining high-flexion design demonstrated an equivalent prosthetic loading along with an inferior amount of femoral rollback in the high-flexion range. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing is an important surgical aim for high-flexion knee arthroplasty.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.J.Zelle@orthop.umcn.nlNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19733944

Citation

Zelle, J, et al. "Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining High-flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty." Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), vol. 24, no. 10, 2009, pp. 842-9.
Zelle J, Van der Zanden AC, De Waal Malefijt M, et al. Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(10):842-9.
Zelle, J., Van der Zanden, A. C., De Waal Malefijt, M., & Verdonschot, N. (2009). Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 24(10), 842-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.004
Zelle J, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining High-flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(10):842-9. PubMed PMID: 19733944.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. AU - Zelle,J, AU - Van der Zanden,A C, AU - De Waal Malefijt,M, AU - Verdonschot,N, Y1 - 2009/09/05/ PY - 2009/04/06/received PY - 2009/06/30/revised PY - 2009/08/09/accepted PY - 2009/9/8/entrez PY - 2009/9/8/pubmed PY - 2010/1/13/medline SP - 842 EP - 9 JF - Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) JO - Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) VL - 24 IS - 10 N2 - BACKGROUND: High-flexion knee replacements have been developed to accommodate a large range of flexion (>120 degrees) after total knee arthroplasty. Both posterior cruciate ligament retaining and sacrificing high-flexion knee designs have been marketed. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a cruciate-retaining high-flexion knee replacement. Furthermore, the mechanical behaviour of this high-flexion knee replacement was compared to both a cruciate-retaining conventional and a posterior-stabilized high-flexion knee replacement. METHODS: A finite element prosthetic knee model was developed to analyze the mechanical performance of the knee designs evaluated in this study. Polyethylene stresses and the amount of femoral rollback were studied during a squatting movement (flexion <or=150 degrees). FINDINGS: During deep knee flexion, the cruciate-retaining high-flexion design demonstrated a lower peak tibio-femoral contact stress (74.7 MPa) than the cruciate-retaining conventional design (96.5 MPa). The posterior-stabilized high-flexion design showed the lowest peak tibio-femoral contact stress at the condylar articulation (54.2 MPa), although the post was loaded higher (77.4 MPa). The knee designs analyzed in this study produced a similar amount of femoral rollback during normal knee flexion (flexion > 120 degrees), whereas the cruciate-retaining designs showed a paradoxical anterior movement of the femoral condyles during high-flexion (flexion>120 degrees). INTERPRETATION: The current study demonstrates a cruciate-retaining high-flexion knee replacement produces a lower prosthetic load than a conventional cruciate-retaining replacement during deep knee flexion. Compared to a posterior-stabilized high-flexion design, the cruciate-retaining high-flexion design demonstrated an equivalent prosthetic loading along with an inferior amount of femoral rollback in the high-flexion range. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing is an important surgical aim for high-flexion knee arthroplasty. SN - 1879-1271 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19733944/Biomechanical_analysis_of_posterior_cruciate_ligament_retaining_high_flexion_total_knee_arthroplasty_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0268-0033(09)00192-2 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -