Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effect of warm-ups involving static or dynamic stretching on agility, sprinting, and jumping performance in trained individuals.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Aug; 24(8):2001-11.JS

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of static and dynamic stretching alone and in combination on subsequent agility, sprinting, and jump performance. Eight different stretching protocols: (a) static stretch (SS) to point of discomfort (POD); (b) SS less than POD (SS<POD); (c) dynamic stretching (DS); (d) SS POD combined with DS (SS POD + DS); (v) SS<POD combined with DS (SS<POD + DS); (vi) DS combined with SS POD (DS + SS POD); (vii) DS combined with SS<POD (DS + SS<POD); and (viii) a control warm-up condition without stretching were implemented with a prior aerobic warm-up and followed by dynamic activities. Dependent variables included a 30-m sprint, agility run, and jump tests. The control condition (4.2 +/- 0.15 seconds) showed significant differences (p = 0.05) for faster times than the DS + SS<POD (4.28s +/- 0.17) condition in the 30-m (1.9%) sprint. There were no other significant differences. The lack of stretch-induced impairments may be attributed to the trained state of the participants or the amount of time used after stretching before the performance. Participants were either professional or national level elite athletes who trained 6-8 times a week with each session lasting approximately 90 minutes. Based on these findings and the literature, trained individuals who wish to implement static stretching should include an adequate warm-up and dynamic sport-specific activities with at least 5 or more minutes of recovery before their sport activity.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Tunisian Research Laboratory Sport Performance Optimization, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports, Tunis, Tunisia. anis.chaouachi@email.ati.tnNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19855310

Citation

Chaouachi, Anis, et al. "Effect of Warm-ups Involving Static or Dynamic Stretching On Agility, Sprinting, and Jumping Performance in Trained Individuals." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 24, no. 8, 2010, pp. 2001-11.
Chaouachi A, Castagna C, Chtara M, et al. Effect of warm-ups involving static or dynamic stretching on agility, sprinting, and jumping performance in trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(8):2001-11.
Chaouachi, A., Castagna, C., Chtara, M., Brughelli, M., Turki, O., Galy, O., Chamari, K., & Behm, D. G. (2010). Effect of warm-ups involving static or dynamic stretching on agility, sprinting, and jumping performance in trained individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(8), 2001-11. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aeb181
Chaouachi A, et al. Effect of Warm-ups Involving Static or Dynamic Stretching On Agility, Sprinting, and Jumping Performance in Trained Individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(8):2001-11. PubMed PMID: 19855310.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of warm-ups involving static or dynamic stretching on agility, sprinting, and jumping performance in trained individuals. AU - Chaouachi,Anis, AU - Castagna,Carlo, AU - Chtara,Moktar, AU - Brughelli,Matt, AU - Turki,Olfa, AU - Galy,Oliver, AU - Chamari,Karim, AU - Behm,David G, PY - 2009/10/27/entrez PY - 2009/10/27/pubmed PY - 2010/11/13/medline SP - 2001 EP - 11 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 24 IS - 8 N2 - The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of static and dynamic stretching alone and in combination on subsequent agility, sprinting, and jump performance. Eight different stretching protocols: (a) static stretch (SS) to point of discomfort (POD); (b) SS less than POD (SS<POD); (c) dynamic stretching (DS); (d) SS POD combined with DS (SS POD + DS); (v) SS<POD combined with DS (SS<POD + DS); (vi) DS combined with SS POD (DS + SS POD); (vii) DS combined with SS<POD (DS + SS<POD); and (viii) a control warm-up condition without stretching were implemented with a prior aerobic warm-up and followed by dynamic activities. Dependent variables included a 30-m sprint, agility run, and jump tests. The control condition (4.2 +/- 0.15 seconds) showed significant differences (p = 0.05) for faster times than the DS + SS<POD (4.28s +/- 0.17) condition in the 30-m (1.9%) sprint. There were no other significant differences. The lack of stretch-induced impairments may be attributed to the trained state of the participants or the amount of time used after stretching before the performance. Participants were either professional or national level elite athletes who trained 6-8 times a week with each session lasting approximately 90 minutes. Based on these findings and the literature, trained individuals who wish to implement static stretching should include an adequate warm-up and dynamic sport-specific activities with at least 5 or more minutes of recovery before their sport activity. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19855310/Effect_of_warm_ups_involving_static_or_dynamic_stretching_on_agility_sprinting_and_jumping_performance_in_trained_individuals_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aeb181 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -