Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Topical photodynamic therapy is immunosuppressive in humans.
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar; 162(3):637-41.BJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Visible light irradiation after application of a photosensitizer (topical photodynamic therapy; PDT) is increasingly used to treat nonmelanoma skin cancers and premalignant actinic keratoses. PDT can provide a cosmetically superior alternative to surgery, but carries failure rates of 10-40%. While some murine studies have suggested immune enhancement by PDT, others reported immunosuppressive effects, which may indicate impaired antitumour immunity and thus compromised tumour clearance.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the in vivo immune effects of PDT in humans.

METHODS

Using healthy, Mantoux-positive volunteers, we irradiated discrete areas of the back with narrowband red light (630 nm; 37 J cm(-2)), with and without prior application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Adjacent, untreated areas served as immunologically intact control sites. Delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to tuberculin purified protein derivative (Mantoux reactions) were then elicited in each of the irradiated, unirradiated and control sites, and the intensity of the reactions was quantitated with an erythema meter and by measurement of Mantoux diameter. By comparing Mantoux intensity at treated and control sites, immunosuppression was determined in each volunteer for each intervention.

RESULTS

We found that both MAL-PDT and ALA-PDT significantly suppressed Mantoux erythema (by 30% and 50%, respectively) and diameter (41% and 38%). Red light alone significantly suppressed diameter (22%) but not erythema (13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical PDT induced significant immune suppression, which could impair local antitumour immune responses and may thus contribute to treatment failure.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Discipline of Dermatology, Sydney Cancer Centre, The University of Sydney at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19863500

Citation

Matthews, Y J., and D L. Damian. "Topical Photodynamic Therapy Is Immunosuppressive in Humans." The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 162, no. 3, 2010, pp. 637-41.
Matthews YJ, Damian DL. Topical photodynamic therapy is immunosuppressive in humans. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(3):637-41.
Matthews, Y. J., & Damian, D. L. (2010). Topical photodynamic therapy is immunosuppressive in humans. The British Journal of Dermatology, 162(3), 637-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09562.x
Matthews YJ, Damian DL. Topical Photodynamic Therapy Is Immunosuppressive in Humans. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(3):637-41. PubMed PMID: 19863500.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Topical photodynamic therapy is immunosuppressive in humans. AU - Matthews,Y J, AU - Damian,D L, Y1 - 2009/10/26/ PY - 2009/10/30/entrez PY - 2009/10/30/pubmed PY - 2010/9/21/medline SP - 637 EP - 41 JF - The British journal of dermatology JO - Br J Dermatol VL - 162 IS - 3 N2 - BACKGROUND: Visible light irradiation after application of a photosensitizer (topical photodynamic therapy; PDT) is increasingly used to treat nonmelanoma skin cancers and premalignant actinic keratoses. PDT can provide a cosmetically superior alternative to surgery, but carries failure rates of 10-40%. While some murine studies have suggested immune enhancement by PDT, others reported immunosuppressive effects, which may indicate impaired antitumour immunity and thus compromised tumour clearance. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the in vivo immune effects of PDT in humans. METHODS: Using healthy, Mantoux-positive volunteers, we irradiated discrete areas of the back with narrowband red light (630 nm; 37 J cm(-2)), with and without prior application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Adjacent, untreated areas served as immunologically intact control sites. Delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to tuberculin purified protein derivative (Mantoux reactions) were then elicited in each of the irradiated, unirradiated and control sites, and the intensity of the reactions was quantitated with an erythema meter and by measurement of Mantoux diameter. By comparing Mantoux intensity at treated and control sites, immunosuppression was determined in each volunteer for each intervention. RESULTS: We found that both MAL-PDT and ALA-PDT significantly suppressed Mantoux erythema (by 30% and 50%, respectively) and diameter (41% and 38%). Red light alone significantly suppressed diameter (22%) but not erythema (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Topical PDT induced significant immune suppression, which could impair local antitumour immune responses and may thus contribute to treatment failure. SN - 1365-2133 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19863500/Topical_photodynamic_therapy_is_immunosuppressive_in_humans_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09562.x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -