Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program.
Health Promot Int. 2009 Dec; 24(4):300-10.HP

Abstract

As part of an evaluation of the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) program, we evaluated resident involvement, broad representation and civic engagement beyond the local CHCC initiative. The evaluation design was a case study of 20 participating communities with cross-case analysis. Data collection methods included: coalition member surveys at two points in time, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus groups with coalition members and document review. Participating communities were diverse in terms of population density, geography and socio-demographic characteristics. Over a 3-year period, grantees developed a broad-based coalition of residents and community sectors, produced a shared vision, conducted an asset-based community assessment, identified a priority community improvement focus, developed an action plan, implemented the plan and evaluated their efforts. Local residents were engaged through coalition membership, assessment activities and implementation activities. Ten of the 20 coalitions had memberships comprised of mainly local residents in the planning phase, with 5 maintaining a high level of resident involvement in governance during the implementation phase. Ninety percent of the coalitions had six or more community sectors represented (e.g. education, faith). The majority of coalitions described at least one example of increased input into local government decision-making and at least one instance in which a resident became more actively involved in the life of their community. Findings suggest that the Healthy Cities and Communities model can be successful in facilitating community participation.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. mkegler@sph.emory.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19884242

Citation

Kegler, Michelle C., et al. "Evaluation Findings On Community Participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program." Health Promotion International, vol. 24, no. 4, 2009, pp. 300-10.
Kegler MC, Painter JE, Twiss JM, et al. Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):300-10.
Kegler, M. C., Painter, J. E., Twiss, J. M., Aronson, R., & Norton, B. L. (2009). Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program. Health Promotion International, 24(4), 300-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap036
Kegler MC, et al. Evaluation Findings On Community Participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):300-10. PubMed PMID: 19884242.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program. AU - Kegler,Michelle C, AU - Painter,Julia Ellenberg, AU - Twiss,Joan M, AU - Aronson,Robert, AU - Norton,Barbara L, Y1 - 2009/11/02/ PY - 2009/11/4/entrez PY - 2009/11/4/pubmed PY - 2010/2/2/medline SP - 300 EP - 10 JF - Health promotion international JO - Health Promot Int VL - 24 IS - 4 N2 - As part of an evaluation of the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) program, we evaluated resident involvement, broad representation and civic engagement beyond the local CHCC initiative. The evaluation design was a case study of 20 participating communities with cross-case analysis. Data collection methods included: coalition member surveys at two points in time, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus groups with coalition members and document review. Participating communities were diverse in terms of population density, geography and socio-demographic characteristics. Over a 3-year period, grantees developed a broad-based coalition of residents and community sectors, produced a shared vision, conducted an asset-based community assessment, identified a priority community improvement focus, developed an action plan, implemented the plan and evaluated their efforts. Local residents were engaged through coalition membership, assessment activities and implementation activities. Ten of the 20 coalitions had memberships comprised of mainly local residents in the planning phase, with 5 maintaining a high level of resident involvement in governance during the implementation phase. Ninety percent of the coalitions had six or more community sectors represented (e.g. education, faith). The majority of coalitions described at least one example of increased input into local government decision-making and at least one instance in which a resident became more actively involved in the life of their community. Findings suggest that the Healthy Cities and Communities model can be successful in facilitating community participation. SN - 1460-2245 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19884242/Evaluation_findings_on_community_participation_in_the_California_Healthy_Cities_and_Communities_program_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/heapro/dap036 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -