Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Repeat transobturator tape after failed mid-urethral sling procedure: follow-up with questionnaire-based assessment.
Urol Int. 2009; 83(4):399-403.UI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if repeat transobturator tape (TOT) is feasible after failed initial synthetic mid-urethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence, and to ascertain objective physician-determined outcome as well as subjective questionnaire-based outcome for this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2005 and February 2008, a total of 21 patients underwent repeat TOT procedure after failed sling treatment. Initial sling procedures were all synthetic MUS, i.e. tension-free vaginal tape in 5 cases and TOT in 16 cases.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 16 months, physician-determined cure was achieved in 55% of patients, improvement in 15% and failure in 30%. Outcome deduced from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire at a mean follow-up of 17 months showed 53% of patients to be cured and 5% of patients to be improved, but failure was noted in 42% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat TOT after failed synthetic MUS treatment is a feasible procedure with minor morbidity. Repeat TOT provides a reasonable physician-determined success rate, but a lower patient self-reported success rate can be deduced from questionnaires. The transobturator approach seems to show poorer outcomes than the retropubic approach in repeat sling surgery.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Urology, Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands. anthonyvanbaelen@hotmail.comNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19996645

Citation

Van Baelen, Anthony A A., and Karl P J. Delaere. "Repeat Transobturator Tape After Failed Mid-urethral Sling Procedure: Follow-up With Questionnaire-based Assessment." Urologia Internationalis, vol. 83, no. 4, 2009, pp. 399-403.
Van Baelen AA, Delaere KP. Repeat transobturator tape after failed mid-urethral sling procedure: follow-up with questionnaire-based assessment. Urol Int. 2009;83(4):399-403.
Van Baelen, A. A., & Delaere, K. P. (2009). Repeat transobturator tape after failed mid-urethral sling procedure: follow-up with questionnaire-based assessment. Urologia Internationalis, 83(4), 399-403. https://doi.org/10.1159/000251178
Van Baelen AA, Delaere KP. Repeat Transobturator Tape After Failed Mid-urethral Sling Procedure: Follow-up With Questionnaire-based Assessment. Urol Int. 2009;83(4):399-403. PubMed PMID: 19996645.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Repeat transobturator tape after failed mid-urethral sling procedure: follow-up with questionnaire-based assessment. AU - Van Baelen,Anthony A A, AU - Delaere,Karl P J, Y1 - 2009/12/08/ PY - 2008/10/16/received PY - 2009/02/04/accepted PY - 2009/12/10/entrez PY - 2009/12/10/pubmed PY - 2010/5/21/medline SP - 399 EP - 403 JF - Urologia internationalis JO - Urol Int VL - 83 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if repeat transobturator tape (TOT) is feasible after failed initial synthetic mid-urethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence, and to ascertain objective physician-determined outcome as well as subjective questionnaire-based outcome for this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2005 and February 2008, a total of 21 patients underwent repeat TOT procedure after failed sling treatment. Initial sling procedures were all synthetic MUS, i.e. tension-free vaginal tape in 5 cases and TOT in 16 cases. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 16 months, physician-determined cure was achieved in 55% of patients, improvement in 15% and failure in 30%. Outcome deduced from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire at a mean follow-up of 17 months showed 53% of patients to be cured and 5% of patients to be improved, but failure was noted in 42% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat TOT after failed synthetic MUS treatment is a feasible procedure with minor morbidity. Repeat TOT provides a reasonable physician-determined success rate, but a lower patient self-reported success rate can be deduced from questionnaires. The transobturator approach seems to show poorer outcomes than the retropubic approach in repeat sling surgery. SN - 1423-0399 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19996645/Repeat_transobturator_tape_after_failed_mid_urethral_sling_procedure:_follow_up_with_questionnaire_based_assessment_ L2 - https://www.karger.com?DOI=10.1159/000251178 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -