Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Cost-benefit analysis of supplemented very low-protein diet versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Mar; 25(3):907-13.ND

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dialysis increases patient life expectancy but is associated with clinically severe and costly complications. Health and economic benefits could derive from postponing dialysis with a supplemented very low-protein diet (sVLPD).

METHODS

An economic evaluation was conducted to compare benefits and costs of sVLPD versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients. Data from 57 patients aged >or=70 years, with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 5-7 mL/min, previously participating in a clinical trial demonstrating non-inferior mortality and morbidity of starting sVLPD compared to dialysis treatment, were analysed: 30 patients were randomized to dialysis and 27 to sVLPD. A cost-benefit analysis was conducted, in the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). Direct medical and non-medical benefits and costs occurring in 3.2 mean years of follow-up were quantified: time free from dialysis, cost of dialysis treatment, hospitalization, drugs, laboratory/instrumental tests, medical visits and travel and energy consumption to receive dialysis. Prices/tariffs valid in 2007 were used, with an annual discount rate of 5% applied to benefits and costs occurring after the first year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify how estimates could vary in different contexts of applications. Results are reported as net benefit, expressed as mean euro/patient (patient-year).

RESULTS

The opportunity to safely postpone initiation of dialysis of 1 year/patient on average translated into an economic benefit to the NHS, corresponding to 21 180 euro/patient in the first, 6500 euro/patient in the second and 682 euro/patient in the third year of treatment, with a significant net benefit in favour of sVLPD even in a worst-case hypothesis.

CONCLUSION

The initiation of sVLPD in elderly CKD5 subjects is a safe and beneficial strategy for these patients and allows them to gain economic resources that can be allocated to further health care investments.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Center for Health Technology Assessment and Outcomes Research, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20008828

Citation

Scalone, Luciana, et al. "Cost-benefit Analysis of Supplemented Very Low-protein Diet Versus Dialysis in Elderly CKD5 Patients." Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation : Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, vol. 25, no. 3, 2010, pp. 907-13.
Scalone L, Borghetti F, Brunori G, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of supplemented very low-protein diet versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(3):907-13.
Scalone, L., Borghetti, F., Brunori, G., Viola, B. F., Brancati, B., Sottini, L., Mantovani, L. G., & Cancarini, G. (2010). Cost-benefit analysis of supplemented very low-protein diet versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation : Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 25(3), 907-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp572
Scalone L, et al. Cost-benefit Analysis of Supplemented Very Low-protein Diet Versus Dialysis in Elderly CKD5 Patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(3):907-13. PubMed PMID: 20008828.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Cost-benefit analysis of supplemented very low-protein diet versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients. AU - Scalone,Luciana, AU - Borghetti,Francesca, AU - Brunori,Giuliano, AU - Viola,Battista Fabio, AU - Brancati,Barbara, AU - Sottini,Laura, AU - Mantovani,Lorenzo Giovanni, AU - Cancarini,Giovanni, Y1 - 2009/12/14/ PY - 2009/12/17/entrez PY - 2009/12/17/pubmed PY - 2010/6/4/medline SP - 907 EP - 13 JF - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association JO - Nephrol Dial Transplant VL - 25 IS - 3 N2 - BACKGROUND: Dialysis increases patient life expectancy but is associated with clinically severe and costly complications. Health and economic benefits could derive from postponing dialysis with a supplemented very low-protein diet (sVLPD). METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted to compare benefits and costs of sVLPD versus dialysis in elderly CKD5 patients. Data from 57 patients aged >or=70 years, with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 5-7 mL/min, previously participating in a clinical trial demonstrating non-inferior mortality and morbidity of starting sVLPD compared to dialysis treatment, were analysed: 30 patients were randomized to dialysis and 27 to sVLPD. A cost-benefit analysis was conducted, in the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). Direct medical and non-medical benefits and costs occurring in 3.2 mean years of follow-up were quantified: time free from dialysis, cost of dialysis treatment, hospitalization, drugs, laboratory/instrumental tests, medical visits and travel and energy consumption to receive dialysis. Prices/tariffs valid in 2007 were used, with an annual discount rate of 5% applied to benefits and costs occurring after the first year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify how estimates could vary in different contexts of applications. Results are reported as net benefit, expressed as mean euro/patient (patient-year). RESULTS: The opportunity to safely postpone initiation of dialysis of 1 year/patient on average translated into an economic benefit to the NHS, corresponding to 21 180 euro/patient in the first, 6500 euro/patient in the second and 682 euro/patient in the third year of treatment, with a significant net benefit in favour of sVLPD even in a worst-case hypothesis. CONCLUSION: The initiation of sVLPD in elderly CKD5 subjects is a safe and beneficial strategy for these patients and allows them to gain economic resources that can be allocated to further health care investments. SN - 1460-2385 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20008828/Cost_benefit_analysis_of_supplemented_very_low_protein_diet_versus_dialysis_in_elderly_CKD5_patients_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ndt/gfp572 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -