Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar; 33(3):562-8.DC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003-2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS

In 2003-2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged > or =12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples.

RESULTS

Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged > or =20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C > or =6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988-1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected.

Authors+Show Affiliations

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. cowie@nih.govNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20067953

Citation

Cowie, Catherine C., et al. "Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988-2006." Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 3, 2010, pp. 562-8.
Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):562-8.
Cowie, C. C., Rust, K. F., Byrd-Holt, D. D., Gregg, E. W., Ford, E. S., Geiss, L. S., Bainbridge, K. E., & Fradkin, J. E. (2010). Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006. Diabetes Care, 33(3), 562-8. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524
Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988-2006. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):562-8. PubMed PMID: 20067953.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006. AU - Cowie,Catherine C, AU - Rust,Keith F, AU - Byrd-Holt,Danita D, AU - Gregg,Edward W, AU - Ford,Earl S, AU - Geiss,Linda S, AU - Bainbridge,Kathleen E, AU - Fradkin,Judith E, Y1 - 2010/01/12/ PY - 2010/1/14/entrez PY - 2010/1/14/pubmed PY - 2010/6/12/medline SP - 562 EP - 8 JF - Diabetes care JO - Diabetes Care VL - 33 IS - 3 N2 - OBJECTIVE We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003-2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In 2003-2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged > or =12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged > or =20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C > or =6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988-1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected. SN - 1935-5548 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20067953/Prevalence_of_diabetes_and_high_risk_for_diabetes_using_A1C_criteria_in_the_U_S__population_in_1988_2006_ L2 - http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&amp;pmid=20067953 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -