Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management.
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun; 30(6):949-57.WM

Abstract

The planning and design of integrated municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems requires accurate environmental impact evaluation of the systems and their components. This research assessed, quantified and compared the environmental impact of the first stage of the most used MSW container systems. The comparison was based on factors such as the volume of the containers, from small bins of 60-80l to containers of 2400l, and on the manufactured materials, steel and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Also, some parameters such as frequency of collections, waste generation, filling percentage and waste container contents, were established to obtain comparable systems. The methodological framework of the analysis was the life cycle assessment (LCA), and the impact assessment method was based on CML 2 baseline 2000. Results indicated that, for the same volume, the collection systems that use HDPE waste containers had more of an impact than those using steel waste containers, in terms of abiotic depletion, global warming, ozone layer depletion, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Besides, the collection systems using small HDPE bins (60l or 80l) had most impact while systems using big steel containers (2400l) had less impact. Subsequent sensitivity analysis about the parameters established demonstrated that they could change the ultimate environmental impact of each waste container collection system, but that the comparative relationship between systems was similar.

Authors+Show Affiliations

SosteniPrA (UAB-IRTA), Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. Jesus.Rives@uab.catNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20171078

Citation

Rives, Jesús, et al. "LCA Comparison of Container Systems in Municipal Solid Waste Management." Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), vol. 30, no. 6, 2010, pp. 949-57.
Rives J, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 2010;30(6):949-57.
Rives, J., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2010). LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 30(6), 949-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.027
Rives J, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. LCA Comparison of Container Systems in Municipal Solid Waste Management. Waste Manag. 2010;30(6):949-57. PubMed PMID: 20171078.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management. AU - Rives,Jesús, AU - Rieradevall,Joan, AU - Gabarrell,Xavier, Y1 - 2010/02/18/ PY - 2009/06/18/received PY - 2009/12/02/revised PY - 2010/01/19/accepted PY - 2010/2/23/entrez PY - 2010/2/23/pubmed PY - 2010/6/17/medline SP - 949 EP - 57 JF - Waste management (New York, N.Y.) JO - Waste Manag VL - 30 IS - 6 N2 - The planning and design of integrated municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems requires accurate environmental impact evaluation of the systems and their components. This research assessed, quantified and compared the environmental impact of the first stage of the most used MSW container systems. The comparison was based on factors such as the volume of the containers, from small bins of 60-80l to containers of 2400l, and on the manufactured materials, steel and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Also, some parameters such as frequency of collections, waste generation, filling percentage and waste container contents, were established to obtain comparable systems. The methodological framework of the analysis was the life cycle assessment (LCA), and the impact assessment method was based on CML 2 baseline 2000. Results indicated that, for the same volume, the collection systems that use HDPE waste containers had more of an impact than those using steel waste containers, in terms of abiotic depletion, global warming, ozone layer depletion, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Besides, the collection systems using small HDPE bins (60l or 80l) had most impact while systems using big steel containers (2400l) had less impact. Subsequent sensitivity analysis about the parameters established demonstrated that they could change the ultimate environmental impact of each waste container collection system, but that the comparative relationship between systems was similar. SN - 1879-2456 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20171078/LCA_comparison_of_container_systems_in_municipal_solid_waste_management_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0956-053X(10)00069-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -