Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Hear Res. 2010 Jun 14; 265(1-2):46-53.HR

Abstract

Speech intelligibility is degraded in the presence of a competing talker for cochlear implantees, presumably because of impaired tracking and integration of speech segments glimpsed in the masker valleys. This hypothesis was tested by assessing the intelligibility of periodically-interrupted bisyllables produced by a male and female talker, for normal-hearing listeners and implantees. A 4-Hz square-wave modulator with random phase was used to interrupt bisyllables from each talker. Stimuli were either presented alone (Experiment I) or interleaved (Experiment II: the two talkers were alternated). In Experiment I, the mean identification score for each voice was 88% for normal-hearing listeners and 35% for implantees. In Experiment II, the mean score corresponding to correct identification of both voices was 50% for normal-hearing listeners and 5% for implantees. Implantees identified at least one bisyllable among the two well above chance level but showed difficulties assigning it to the correct talker. This suggests that implantees can make use of partial information, but cannot track and integrate the non-adjacent components of interleaved speech as well as normal-hearing listeners. Additional results obtained with normal-hearing listeners tested with tone-vocoded syllables suggest that impaired tracking/integration for implantees stems from limited reception of spectral and temporal fine structure cues.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Laboratoire de Psychologie de la Perception-UMR CNRS 8158, Université Paris Descartes and Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45 rue des Saint Pères, 75006 Paris, France. dan.gnansia@ens.frNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20197084

Citation

Gnansia, Dan, et al. "Intelligibility of Interrupted and Interleaved Speech for Normal-hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implantees." Hearing Research, vol. 265, no. 1-2, 2010, pp. 46-53.
Gnansia D, Pressnitzer D, Péan V, et al. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees. Hear Res. 2010;265(1-2):46-53.
Gnansia, D., Pressnitzer, D., Péan, V., Meyer, B., & Lorenzi, C. (2010). Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees. Hearing Research, 265(1-2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.012
Gnansia D, et al. Intelligibility of Interrupted and Interleaved Speech for Normal-hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implantees. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 14;265(1-2):46-53. PubMed PMID: 20197084.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees. AU - Gnansia,Dan, AU - Pressnitzer,Daniel, AU - Péan,Vincent, AU - Meyer,Bernard, AU - Lorenzi,Christian, Y1 - 2010/03/01/ PY - 2009/07/03/received PY - 2010/02/15/revised PY - 2010/02/24/accepted PY - 2010/3/4/entrez PY - 2010/3/4/pubmed PY - 2010/8/25/medline SP - 46 EP - 53 JF - Hearing research JO - Hear Res VL - 265 IS - 1-2 N2 - Speech intelligibility is degraded in the presence of a competing talker for cochlear implantees, presumably because of impaired tracking and integration of speech segments glimpsed in the masker valleys. This hypothesis was tested by assessing the intelligibility of periodically-interrupted bisyllables produced by a male and female talker, for normal-hearing listeners and implantees. A 4-Hz square-wave modulator with random phase was used to interrupt bisyllables from each talker. Stimuli were either presented alone (Experiment I) or interleaved (Experiment II: the two talkers were alternated). In Experiment I, the mean identification score for each voice was 88% for normal-hearing listeners and 35% for implantees. In Experiment II, the mean score corresponding to correct identification of both voices was 50% for normal-hearing listeners and 5% for implantees. Implantees identified at least one bisyllable among the two well above chance level but showed difficulties assigning it to the correct talker. This suggests that implantees can make use of partial information, but cannot track and integrate the non-adjacent components of interleaved speech as well as normal-hearing listeners. Additional results obtained with normal-hearing listeners tested with tone-vocoded syllables suggest that impaired tracking/integration for implantees stems from limited reception of spectral and temporal fine structure cues. SN - 1878-5891 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20197084/Intelligibility_of_interrupted_and_interleaved_speech_for_normal_hearing_listeners_and_cochlear_implantees_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378-5955(10)00049-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -