Physician compensation: approach and models in neurological practice.Neurol Clin. 2010 May; 28(2):339-48.NC
Abstract
Compensation methodology has always challenged physician groups. The highly complex system of reimbursement for the physician's services in the rapidly changing environment of health care makes the choice of a compensation model even more problematic. Any methodology chosen should reflect the underlying philosophy and culture of a group , and have the flexibility to accommodate the variability of interests, expertise, energy levels, and practice styles of its members. Further, compensation models must strike a balance between the financial viability of the practice and fair compensation for all physicians. This article describes the most common compensation structures and addresses the strengths and weaknesses of each.
Links
Publisher Full Text
MeSH
Pub Type(s)
Journal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
20202496
Citation
Sigsbee, Bruce. "Physician Compensation: Approach and Models in Neurological Practice." Neurologic Clinics, vol. 28, no. 2, 2010, pp. 339-48.
Sigsbee B. Physician compensation: approach and models in neurological practice. Neurol Clin. 2010;28(2):339-48.
Sigsbee, B. (2010). Physician compensation: approach and models in neurological practice. Neurologic Clinics, 28(2), 339-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2009.11.012
Sigsbee B. Physician Compensation: Approach and Models in Neurological Practice. Neurol Clin. 2010;28(2):339-48. PubMed PMID: 20202496.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR
T1 - Physician compensation: approach and models in neurological practice.
A1 - Sigsbee,Bruce,
PY - 2010/3/6/entrez
PY - 2010/3/6/pubmed
PY - 2010/6/15/medline
SP - 339
EP - 48
JF - Neurologic clinics
JO - Neurol Clin
VL - 28
IS - 2
N2 - Compensation methodology has always challenged physician groups. The highly complex system of reimbursement for the physician's services in the rapidly changing environment of health care makes the choice of a compensation model even more problematic. Any methodology chosen should reflect the underlying philosophy and culture of a group , and have the flexibility to accommodate the variability of interests, expertise, energy levels, and practice styles of its members. Further, compensation models must strike a balance between the financial viability of the practice and fair compensation for all physicians. This article describes the most common compensation structures and addresses the strengths and weaknesses of each.
SN - 1557-9875
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20202496/Physician_compensation:_approach_and_models_in_neurological_practice_
L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0733-8619(09)00120-0
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -