Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: the Philadelphia area research community coalition.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Spring; 3(1):61-72.PC

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A coalition of formal, large organizations and informal, grassroots organizations, recruited through an open process, contrasts with the usual practice of developing a community-based participatory research (CBPR) coalition with a small number of well-developed organizations.

OBJECTIVES

This paper describes the process, developmental challenges, and accomplishments of the Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition (PARCC).

METHODS

The University of Pennsylvania-Cheyney University of Pennsylvania EXPORT Center established the PARCC, an academic-community research partnership of twenty-two diverse organizations of variable size and with variable experience in health research. The EXPORT Center provided the infrastructure and staff support needed to engage in sustained, face-to-face community outreach and to nurture, coordinate, and facilitate the 2.5-year developmental process. The start-up process, governing principles, activities, challenges, and lessons learned are described.

LESSONS LEARNED

Since its inception, PARCC established core work groups, a governance structure, operating principles, research training activities, community health education projects, and several PARCC-affiliated research projects. Organizations across the spectrum of developmental capacity were major contributors to PARCC. The success of PARCC was based on committed and trusted leadership, preexisting relationships, trust among members from the community and academia, research training, extensive time commitment of members to the coalition's work, and rapid development of work group activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Building a CBPR coalition from the ground up involving organizations of diverse size and at various stages of development presents unique challenges that can be overcome with committed leadership, clear governance principles, and appropriate infrastructure. Engagement in community-based research during the early stages, while still developing trust, structure, and governance procedures can be accomplished as long as training of all partners is conducted and the trust building is not ignored.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, PA, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20208302

Citation

Johnson, Jerry C., et al. "Building Community Participatory Research Coalitions From the Ground Up: the Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition." Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, vol. 3, no. 1, 2009, pp. 61-72.
Johnson JC, Hayden UT, Thomas N, et al. Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: the Philadelphia area research community coalition. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009;3(1):61-72.
Johnson, J. C., Hayden, U. T., Thomas, N., Groce-Martin, J., Henry, T., Guerra, T., Walker, A., West, W., Barnett, M., & Kumanyika, S. (2009). Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: the Philadelphia area research community coalition. Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 3(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0052
Johnson JC, et al. Building Community Participatory Research Coalitions From the Ground Up: the Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009;3(1):61-72. PubMed PMID: 20208302.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: the Philadelphia area research community coalition. AU - Johnson,Jerry C, AU - Hayden,U Tara, AU - Thomas,Nicole, AU - Groce-Martin,Jennine, AU - Henry,Thomas, AU - Guerra,Terry, AU - Walker,Alia, AU - West,William, AU - Barnett,Marina, AU - Kumanyika,Shiriki, PY - 2010/3/9/entrez PY - 2009/1/1/pubmed PY - 2011/1/7/medline SP - 61 EP - 72 JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action JO - Prog Community Health Partnersh VL - 3 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: A coalition of formal, large organizations and informal, grassroots organizations, recruited through an open process, contrasts with the usual practice of developing a community-based participatory research (CBPR) coalition with a small number of well-developed organizations. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the process, developmental challenges, and accomplishments of the Philadelphia Area Research Community Coalition (PARCC). METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania-Cheyney University of Pennsylvania EXPORT Center established the PARCC, an academic-community research partnership of twenty-two diverse organizations of variable size and with variable experience in health research. The EXPORT Center provided the infrastructure and staff support needed to engage in sustained, face-to-face community outreach and to nurture, coordinate, and facilitate the 2.5-year developmental process. The start-up process, governing principles, activities, challenges, and lessons learned are described. LESSONS LEARNED: Since its inception, PARCC established core work groups, a governance structure, operating principles, research training activities, community health education projects, and several PARCC-affiliated research projects. Organizations across the spectrum of developmental capacity were major contributors to PARCC. The success of PARCC was based on committed and trusted leadership, preexisting relationships, trust among members from the community and academia, research training, extensive time commitment of members to the coalition's work, and rapid development of work group activities. CONCLUSIONS: Building a CBPR coalition from the ground up involving organizations of diverse size and at various stages of development presents unique challenges that can be overcome with committed leadership, clear governance principles, and appropriate infrastructure. Engagement in community-based research during the early stages, while still developing trust, structure, and governance procedures can be accomplished as long as training of all partners is conducted and the trust building is not ignored. SN - 1557-0541 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20208302/Building_community_participatory_research_coalitions_from_the_ground_up:_the_Philadelphia_area_research_community_coalition_ L2 - http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/resolve_openurl.cgi?issn=1557-0541&volume=3&issue=1&spage=61&aulast=Johnson DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -