Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr; 32(2):207-13.EJ

Abstract

Significant heterogeneity has previously been reported but with no consensus on the prevalence of dental anomalies in subjects with a cleft lip and palate (CLP), thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of various dental anomalies in the upper dental arch in different cleft groups. Diagnostic records, i.e., panoramic, occlusal and periapical films, dental casts, and intra-oral photographs, of 122 subjects (mean age: 14 +/- 5 years; 67 males and 55 females) were grouped as either unilateral left cleft lip and palate (ULCLP), unilateral right cleft lip and palate (URCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), or cleft palate (CP). Prevalence rates of 15 different dental anomalies were calculated for each group. Wilcoxon's test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the number of missing teeth between the right and left sides, in each cleft group. Overall, 96.7 percent of patients were found to have at least one dental anomaly. The most prevalent was agenesis in the anterior region on the cleft side (70.8-97.1 percent). There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of agenesis by cleft and non-cleft sides but only in the ULCLP group (P < 0.001). Significantly higher rates of impaction were observed in the anterior and premolar regions in the CLP groups (2.9-29.2 percent), with the highest rates in the anterior region on the cleft sides. A very high proportion of subjects were found to have at least one dental anomaly. Thus, the management of dental anomalies should be central to the treatment planning process of individuals with a cleft.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20335565

Citation

Akcam, M Okan, et al. "Dental Anomalies in Individuals With Cleft Lip And/or Palate." European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 32, no. 2, 2010, pp. 207-13.
Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Uslu O, et al. Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(2):207-13.
Akcam, M. O., Evirgen, S., Uslu, O., & Memikoğlu, U. T. (2010). Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. European Journal of Orthodontics, 32(2), 207-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp156
Akcam MO, et al. Dental Anomalies in Individuals With Cleft Lip And/or Palate. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(2):207-13. PubMed PMID: 20335565.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. AU - Akcam,M Okan, AU - Evirgen,Sehrazat, AU - Uslu,Ozge, AU - Memikoğlu,Ufuk Toygar, PY - 2010/3/26/entrez PY - 2010/3/26/pubmed PY - 2010/6/22/medline SP - 207 EP - 13 JF - European journal of orthodontics JO - Eur J Orthod VL - 32 IS - 2 N2 - Significant heterogeneity has previously been reported but with no consensus on the prevalence of dental anomalies in subjects with a cleft lip and palate (CLP), thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of various dental anomalies in the upper dental arch in different cleft groups. Diagnostic records, i.e., panoramic, occlusal and periapical films, dental casts, and intra-oral photographs, of 122 subjects (mean age: 14 +/- 5 years; 67 males and 55 females) were grouped as either unilateral left cleft lip and palate (ULCLP), unilateral right cleft lip and palate (URCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), or cleft palate (CP). Prevalence rates of 15 different dental anomalies were calculated for each group. Wilcoxon's test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the number of missing teeth between the right and left sides, in each cleft group. Overall, 96.7 percent of patients were found to have at least one dental anomaly. The most prevalent was agenesis in the anterior region on the cleft side (70.8-97.1 percent). There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of agenesis by cleft and non-cleft sides but only in the ULCLP group (P < 0.001). Significantly higher rates of impaction were observed in the anterior and premolar regions in the CLP groups (2.9-29.2 percent), with the highest rates in the anterior region on the cleft sides. A very high proportion of subjects were found to have at least one dental anomaly. Thus, the management of dental anomalies should be central to the treatment planning process of individuals with a cleft. SN - 1460-2210 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20335565/Dental_anomalies_in_individuals_with_cleft_lip_and/or_palate_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejo/cjp156 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -