Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Is there any difference in outcomes between long pigtail and short flanged prophylactic pancreatic duct stents?
Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56(1):260-5DD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement has been shown to reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) especially in high-risk patients. However, there is no consensus on the best type of PD stent. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the differences in the outcomes between long (>3 cm) pigtail and short (≤3 cm) flanged 4 Fr Freeman Pancreatic Flexi-Stents in preventing PEP.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP procedures performed between 08/01/2006 and 10/01/2007 by one of two experienced endoscopists (>5 years of experience) with the assistance of a trainee. Patient data was collected for indications, risk factors for PEP, type and reason for PD stent, complications, and any mortality. The PD stent was removed endoscopically if it was still in place on abdominal X-ray done 2 weeks post-ERCP. The data was analyzed with Student's t test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests by using SPSS software version 15.0.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 753 ERCP procedures, 179 (23.8%) required either long or short prophylactic PD stents. The incidence of PEP was 3.7% versus 13.6% for long and short stent groups, respectively (p=0.019). Spontaneous stent dislodgement rate was 95.4% versus 81.8% for long and short stent groups, respectively (p=0.007). There was no difference in non-pancreatic complications between the two stent groups. There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Long (>3 cm) pigtail PD stent due to their specific design showed better outcomes as compared to short (<3 cm) flanged PD stent in preventing PEP and spontaneous stent dislodgement rates. However, further prospective trials are needed.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA. siqbal50@gmail.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20464492

Citation

Iqbal, Shahzad, et al. "Is There Any Difference in Outcomes Between Long Pigtail and Short Flanged Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stents?" Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 1, 2011, pp. 260-5.
Iqbal S, Shah S, Dhar V, et al. Is there any difference in outcomes between long pigtail and short flanged prophylactic pancreatic duct stents? Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(1):260-5.
Iqbal, S., Shah, S., Dhar, V., Stavropoulos, S. N., & Stevens, P. D. (2011). Is there any difference in outcomes between long pigtail and short flanged prophylactic pancreatic duct stents? Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 56(1), pp. 260-5. doi:10.1007/s10620-010-1262-x.
Iqbal S, et al. Is There Any Difference in Outcomes Between Long Pigtail and Short Flanged Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stents. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(1):260-5. PubMed PMID: 20464492.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Is there any difference in outcomes between long pigtail and short flanged prophylactic pancreatic duct stents? AU - Iqbal,Shahzad, AU - Shah,Shashin, AU - Dhar,Vasudha, AU - Stavropoulos,Stavros N, AU - Stevens,Peter D, Y1 - 2010/05/13/ PY - 2009/12/08/received PY - 2010/04/20/accepted PY - 2010/5/14/entrez PY - 2010/5/14/pubmed PY - 2011/1/21/medline SP - 260 EP - 5 JF - Digestive diseases and sciences JO - Dig. Dis. Sci. VL - 56 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement has been shown to reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) especially in high-risk patients. However, there is no consensus on the best type of PD stent. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the differences in the outcomes between long (>3 cm) pigtail and short (≤3 cm) flanged 4 Fr Freeman Pancreatic Flexi-Stents in preventing PEP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP procedures performed between 08/01/2006 and 10/01/2007 by one of two experienced endoscopists (>5 years of experience) with the assistance of a trainee. Patient data was collected for indications, risk factors for PEP, type and reason for PD stent, complications, and any mortality. The PD stent was removed endoscopically if it was still in place on abdominal X-ray done 2 weeks post-ERCP. The data was analyzed with Student's t test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests by using SPSS software version 15.0. RESULTS: Out of a total of 753 ERCP procedures, 179 (23.8%) required either long or short prophylactic PD stents. The incidence of PEP was 3.7% versus 13.6% for long and short stent groups, respectively (p=0.019). Spontaneous stent dislodgement rate was 95.4% versus 81.8% for long and short stent groups, respectively (p=0.007). There was no difference in non-pancreatic complications between the two stent groups. There was no procedure-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Long (>3 cm) pigtail PD stent due to their specific design showed better outcomes as compared to short (<3 cm) flanged PD stent in preventing PEP and spontaneous stent dislodgement rates. However, further prospective trials are needed. SN - 1573-2568 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20464492/Is_there_any_difference_in_outcomes_between_long_pigtail_and_short_flanged_prophylactic_pancreatic_duct_stents L2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1262-x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -