Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence.
BJU Int. 2010 Dec; 106(11):1668-72.BI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 118 men with SUI after prostatic surgery, a transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension was implanted. Patients were evaluated including: complete history and physical examination, 24-h pad test, a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, Short-Form), urodynamic evaluation and endoscopy. The surgical technique was described previously. The findings before and at 1 year after sling placement were compared.

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, 73.7% of the men were cured, 16.9% were improved, and 9.3% were still incontinent. After sling placement the daily pad use decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while the ICIQ-SF improved significantly (P < 0.01). The detrusor voiding pressure, postvoid residual urine volume and maximal flow rates remained unchanged, while the Valsalva leak-point pressure improved significantly (P < 0.01). In 19.5% of the men, there was transient scrotal pain or perineal discomfort. In 5.1% of the men, postoperative urinary retention occurred but resolved spontaneously after a few weeks of catheter placement. In 1.7% of the men adductor pain was reported, which resolved spontaneously. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSION

The transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension for the treatment of male SUI is effective and safe with a low complication rate after 1 year of follow-up.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. peter.rehder@i-med.ac.atNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20518761

Citation

Rehder, Peter, et al. "The 1 Year Outcome of the Transobturator Retroluminal Repositioning Sling in the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence." BJU International, vol. 106, no. 11, 2010, pp. 1668-72.
Rehder P, Mitterberger MJ, Pichler R, et al. The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1668-72.
Rehder, P., Mitterberger, M. J., Pichler, R., Kerschbaumer, A., & Glodny, B. (2010). The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. BJU International, 106(11), 1668-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09400.x
Rehder P, et al. The 1 Year Outcome of the Transobturator Retroluminal Repositioning Sling in the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1668-72. PubMed PMID: 20518761.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. AU - Rehder,Peter, AU - Mitterberger,Michael J, AU - Pichler,Renate, AU - Kerschbaumer,Andrea, AU - Glodny,Bernhard, PY - 2010/6/4/entrez PY - 2010/6/4/pubmed PY - 2011/1/5/medline SP - 1668 EP - 72 JF - BJU international JO - BJU Int VL - 106 IS - 11 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 118 men with SUI after prostatic surgery, a transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension was implanted. Patients were evaluated including: complete history and physical examination, 24-h pad test, a questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, Short-Form), urodynamic evaluation and endoscopy. The surgical technique was described previously. The findings before and at 1 year after sling placement were compared. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, 73.7% of the men were cured, 16.9% were improved, and 9.3% were still incontinent. After sling placement the daily pad use decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while the ICIQ-SF improved significantly (P < 0.01). The detrusor voiding pressure, postvoid residual urine volume and maximal flow rates remained unchanged, while the Valsalva leak-point pressure improved significantly (P < 0.01). In 19.5% of the men, there was transient scrotal pain or perineal discomfort. In 5.1% of the men, postoperative urinary retention occurred but resolved spontaneously after a few weeks of catheter placement. In 1.7% of the men adductor pain was reported, which resolved spontaneously. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: The transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension for the treatment of male SUI is effective and safe with a low complication rate after 1 year of follow-up. SN - 1464-410X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20518761/The_1_year_outcome_of_the_transobturator_retroluminal_repositioning_sling_in_the_treatment_of_male_stress_urinary_incontinence_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -