Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Assessment of carbon monoxide values in smokers: a comparison of carbon monoxide in expired air and carboxyhaemoglobin in arterial blood.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep; 27(9):812-8.EJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Smoking increases perioperative complications. Carbon monoxide concentrations can estimate patients' smoking status and might be relevant in preoperative risk assessment. In smokers, we compared measurements of carbon monoxide in expired air (COexp) with measurements of carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) in arterial blood. The objectives were to determine the level of correlation and to determine whether the methods showed agreement and evaluate them as diagnostic tests in discriminating between heavy and light smokers.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 37 patients. The Micro Smokerlyzer was used to measure COexp; it measures COexp in parts per million (ppm) and converts it to the percentage of haemoglobin combined with carbon monoxide (%Hb). COHb in arterial blood was measured by the ABL 725. Correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were performed, and 2 x 2 contingency tables and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

The correlation between the methods was high (rho = 0.964). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the Micro Smokerlyzer underestimated COHb values. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.746 (ABL 725) and 0.754 (Micro Smokerlyzer) and, by comparison, no statistically significant difference was found (P = 0.815).

CONCLUSION

The two methods showed a high level of correlation, but poor agreement. The Micro Smokerlyzer systematically underestimated COHb values and, in order to avoid this, we suggested an alternative algorithm for converting COexp from ppm to %Hb. The ABL 725 and Micro Smokerlyzer were fair diagnostic tests in distinguishing between heavy and light smokers, but the longer the patients' smoking cessation time, the poorer the ability as diagnostic tests.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. mf_andersson@hotmail.comNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20520557

Citation

Andersson, Mette F., and Ann M. Møller. "Assessment of Carbon Monoxide Values in Smokers: a Comparison of Carbon Monoxide in Expired Air and Carboxyhaemoglobin in Arterial Blood." European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 27, no. 9, 2010, pp. 812-8.
Andersson MF, Møller AM. Assessment of carbon monoxide values in smokers: a comparison of carbon monoxide in expired air and carboxyhaemoglobin in arterial blood. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(9):812-8.
Andersson, M. F., & Møller, A. M. (2010). Assessment of carbon monoxide values in smokers: a comparison of carbon monoxide in expired air and carboxyhaemoglobin in arterial blood. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 27(9), 812-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a55ea
Andersson MF, Møller AM. Assessment of Carbon Monoxide Values in Smokers: a Comparison of Carbon Monoxide in Expired Air and Carboxyhaemoglobin in Arterial Blood. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(9):812-8. PubMed PMID: 20520557.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of carbon monoxide values in smokers: a comparison of carbon monoxide in expired air and carboxyhaemoglobin in arterial blood. AU - Andersson,Mette F, AU - Møller,Ann M, PY - 2010/6/4/entrez PY - 2010/6/4/pubmed PY - 2010/11/17/medline SP - 812 EP - 8 JF - European journal of anaesthesiology JO - Eur J Anaesthesiol VL - 27 IS - 9 N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Smoking increases perioperative complications. Carbon monoxide concentrations can estimate patients' smoking status and might be relevant in preoperative risk assessment. In smokers, we compared measurements of carbon monoxide in expired air (COexp) with measurements of carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) in arterial blood. The objectives were to determine the level of correlation and to determine whether the methods showed agreement and evaluate them as diagnostic tests in discriminating between heavy and light smokers. METHODS: The study population consisted of 37 patients. The Micro Smokerlyzer was used to measure COexp; it measures COexp in parts per million (ppm) and converts it to the percentage of haemoglobin combined with carbon monoxide (%Hb). COHb in arterial blood was measured by the ABL 725. Correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were performed, and 2 x 2 contingency tables and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were conducted. RESULTS: The correlation between the methods was high (rho = 0.964). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the Micro Smokerlyzer underestimated COHb values. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.746 (ABL 725) and 0.754 (Micro Smokerlyzer) and, by comparison, no statistically significant difference was found (P = 0.815). CONCLUSION: The two methods showed a high level of correlation, but poor agreement. The Micro Smokerlyzer systematically underestimated COHb values and, in order to avoid this, we suggested an alternative algorithm for converting COexp from ppm to %Hb. The ABL 725 and Micro Smokerlyzer were fair diagnostic tests in distinguishing between heavy and light smokers, but the longer the patients' smoking cessation time, the poorer the ability as diagnostic tests. SN - 1365-2346 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20520557/Assessment_of_carbon_monoxide_values_in_smokers:_a_comparison_of_carbon_monoxide_in_expired_air_and_carboxyhaemoglobin_in_arterial_blood_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a55ea DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -