Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.
Aust Orthod J. 2010 May; 26(1):84-9.AO

Abstract

AIM

To determine the shear bond strengths (SBS) of stainless steel brackets bonded with seven light-cured orthodontic adhesives after the enamel was conditioned with the same self-etching primer.

METHODS

A total of 140 extracted human molars were randomly divided into seven groups (N = 20). In all the groups, the enamel was conditioned with Transbond Plus SEP (TPSEP). Stainless steel brackets were bonded with the following orthodontic adhesives: Group I, Transbond XT; Group II, Blūgloo; Group III, BeautyOrtho Bond; Group IV, Enlight; Group V, Light Bond; Group VI, Transbond CC; Group VII, Xeno Ortho. The teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and debonded with a universal testing machine. The modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the SBS values among the groups: I (18.0 +/- 7.4 MPa); II (18.3 +/- 5.1 MPa); III (14.8 +/- 4.3 MPa); IV (18.3 +/- 7.0 MPa); V (16.4 +/- 4.3 MPa); VI (20.3 +/- 5.3 MPa); VII (15.9 +/- 6.4 MPa), but significant differences in ARI were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The seven orthodontic adhesives evaluated in this study can be successfully used for bonding stainless steel brackets when the enamel is conditioned with TPSEP, however, the differences among some groups might influence the clinical bond strengths. In addition, the amount of residual adhesive remaining on the teeth after debonding differed among the adhesives. Further studies are required to better understand the differences in SBS and ARI.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico, Toluca City, Mexico. rogelio_scougall@hotmail.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20575206

Citation

Scougall-Vilchis, Rogelio J., et al. "Bond Strengths of Different Orthodontic Adhesives After Enamel Conditioning With the Same Self-etching Primer." Australian Orthodontic Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2010, pp. 84-9.
Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Zárate-Díaz C, Kusakabe S, et al. Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. Aust Orthod J. 2010;26(1):84-9.
Scougall-Vilchis, R. J., Zárate-Díaz, C., Kusakabe, S., & Yamamoto, K. (2010). Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. Australian Orthodontic Journal, 26(1), 84-9.
Scougall-Vilchis RJ, et al. Bond Strengths of Different Orthodontic Adhesives After Enamel Conditioning With the Same Self-etching Primer. Aust Orthod J. 2010;26(1):84-9. PubMed PMID: 20575206.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. AU - Scougall-Vilchis,Rogelio J, AU - Zárate-Díaz,Chrisel, AU - Kusakabe,Shusuke, AU - Yamamoto,Kohji, PY - 2010/6/26/entrez PY - 2010/6/26/pubmed PY - 2010/8/19/medline SP - 84 EP - 9 JF - Australian orthodontic journal JO - Aust Orthod J VL - 26 IS - 1 N2 - AIM: To determine the shear bond strengths (SBS) of stainless steel brackets bonded with seven light-cured orthodontic adhesives after the enamel was conditioned with the same self-etching primer. METHODS: A total of 140 extracted human molars were randomly divided into seven groups (N = 20). In all the groups, the enamel was conditioned with Transbond Plus SEP (TPSEP). Stainless steel brackets were bonded with the following orthodontic adhesives: Group I, Transbond XT; Group II, Blūgloo; Group III, BeautyOrtho Bond; Group IV, Enlight; Group V, Light Bond; Group VI, Transbond CC; Group VII, Xeno Ortho. The teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and debonded with a universal testing machine. The modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the SBS values among the groups: I (18.0 +/- 7.4 MPa); II (18.3 +/- 5.1 MPa); III (14.8 +/- 4.3 MPa); IV (18.3 +/- 7.0 MPa); V (16.4 +/- 4.3 MPa); VI (20.3 +/- 5.3 MPa); VII (15.9 +/- 6.4 MPa), but significant differences in ARI were found. CONCLUSIONS: The seven orthodontic adhesives evaluated in this study can be successfully used for bonding stainless steel brackets when the enamel is conditioned with TPSEP, however, the differences among some groups might influence the clinical bond strengths. In addition, the amount of residual adhesive remaining on the teeth after debonding differed among the adhesives. Further studies are required to better understand the differences in SBS and ARI. SN - 0587-3908 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20575206/Bond_strengths_of_different_orthodontic_adhesives_after_enamel_conditioning_with_the_same_self_etching_primer_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -