Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Perceived exertion in different strength exercise loads in sedentary, active, and trained adults.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Aug; 24(8):2032-41.JS

Abstract

The aim was to analyze the relationship between the perceived exertion (PE) and different loads in strength exercises (SEs), in sedentary, active, and trained adult subjects. Thirty young men (18-34 years) were divided into 3 groups (experimental group [EG]): sedentary EG (SEG), physically active group (PAG), and the strength trained group (STG). Maximum strength was established using the 1 repetition maximum test (1RM). Using series of 12 repetitions, different loads were applied until the 4 ratings of PE (RPEs) (11, 13, 15, and 17) from 15 category Borg Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE 6-20). The pace of the repetitions and the intervals between the sets were controlled, the loads were blind, the order of the RPE randomized, whereas the PE was localized and determined after completion of the series. Strength correlations between the RPE and the %1RM, according to the EGs and SEs (0.826-0.922, p < 0.001), were observed. Similar behavior was seen in the SEs. Higher loads are related to higher RPEs and are differentiated between the EGs. The STG used higher %1RM when compared to the SEG, whereas the PAG, displayed an intermediary behavior in relation to the other groups. The use of PE represents a reliable instrument for the measurement of intensity in strength training.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. cltiggemann@yahoo.com.brNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20634752

Citation

Tiggemann, Carlos L., et al. "Perceived Exertion in Different Strength Exercise Loads in Sedentary, Active, and Trained Adults." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 24, no. 8, 2010, pp. 2032-41.
Tiggemann CL, Korzenowski AL, Brentano MA, et al. Perceived exertion in different strength exercise loads in sedentary, active, and trained adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(8):2032-41.
Tiggemann, C. L., Korzenowski, A. L., Brentano, M. A., Tartaruga, M. P., Alberton, C. L., & Kruel, L. F. (2010). Perceived exertion in different strength exercise loads in sedentary, active, and trained adults. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(8), 2032-41. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d32e29
Tiggemann CL, et al. Perceived Exertion in Different Strength Exercise Loads in Sedentary, Active, and Trained Adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(8):2032-41. PubMed PMID: 20634752.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Perceived exertion in different strength exercise loads in sedentary, active, and trained adults. AU - Tiggemann,Carlos L, AU - Korzenowski,André L, AU - Brentano,Michel A, AU - Tartaruga,Marcus P, AU - Alberton,Cristine L, AU - Kruel,Luiz F M, PY - 2010/7/17/entrez PY - 2010/7/17/pubmed PY - 2010/11/13/medline SP - 2032 EP - 41 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 24 IS - 8 N2 - The aim was to analyze the relationship between the perceived exertion (PE) and different loads in strength exercises (SEs), in sedentary, active, and trained adult subjects. Thirty young men (18-34 years) were divided into 3 groups (experimental group [EG]): sedentary EG (SEG), physically active group (PAG), and the strength trained group (STG). Maximum strength was established using the 1 repetition maximum test (1RM). Using series of 12 repetitions, different loads were applied until the 4 ratings of PE (RPEs) (11, 13, 15, and 17) from 15 category Borg Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE 6-20). The pace of the repetitions and the intervals between the sets were controlled, the loads were blind, the order of the RPE randomized, whereas the PE was localized and determined after completion of the series. Strength correlations between the RPE and the %1RM, according to the EGs and SEs (0.826-0.922, p < 0.001), were observed. Similar behavior was seen in the SEs. Higher loads are related to higher RPEs and are differentiated between the EGs. The STG used higher %1RM when compared to the SEG, whereas the PAG, displayed an intermediary behavior in relation to the other groups. The use of PE represents a reliable instrument for the measurement of intensity in strength training. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20634752/Perceived_exertion_in_different_strength_exercise_loads_in_sedentary_active_and_trained_adults_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d32e29 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -