Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Are male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence a valid option?
Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Nov; 20(6):465-70.CO

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress incontinence in men is still a common problem after surgical treatment of prostatic disease. This article reviews the techniques and results of recently described surgical slings available to treat male stress incontinence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Medium-term follow-up (mean 3-4 years) of patients treated with bone-anchored slings has been recently published, suggesting a success rate (cured or improved) of 70-80%. Short-term follow-up (mean of 6-12 months) of transobturator retrourethral slings demonstrates a success rate of 62-83%. Novel sling designs include mechanisms to manipulate the tension postoperatively and inside-out transobturator trocar passage. Common complications associated with slings are acute urinary retention and perineal pain. Rare complications include urethral erosion and infection. Retropubic approaches are associated with a risk of bladder perforation.

SUMMARY

Male slings are a valid option for treating male stress incontinence, and do offer several advantages over the artificial urinary sphincter. However, long-term data and multicenter series are needed in order to compare directly with the artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20838219

Citation

Welk, Blayne K., and Sender Herschorn. "Are Male Slings for Post-prostatectomy Incontinence a Valid Option?" Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 20, no. 6, 2010, pp. 465-70.
Welk BK, Herschorn S. Are male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence a valid option? Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20(6):465-70.
Welk, B. K., & Herschorn, S. (2010). Are male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence a valid option? Current Opinion in Urology, 20(6), 465-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833ecd09
Welk BK, Herschorn S. Are Male Slings for Post-prostatectomy Incontinence a Valid Option. Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20(6):465-70. PubMed PMID: 20838219.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Are male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence a valid option? AU - Welk,Blayne K, AU - Herschorn,Sender, PY - 2010/9/15/entrez PY - 2010/9/15/pubmed PY - 2011/2/2/medline SP - 465 EP - 70 JF - Current opinion in urology JO - Curr Opin Urol VL - 20 IS - 6 N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stress incontinence in men is still a common problem after surgical treatment of prostatic disease. This article reviews the techniques and results of recently described surgical slings available to treat male stress incontinence. RECENT FINDINGS: Medium-term follow-up (mean 3-4 years) of patients treated with bone-anchored slings has been recently published, suggesting a success rate (cured or improved) of 70-80%. Short-term follow-up (mean of 6-12 months) of transobturator retrourethral slings demonstrates a success rate of 62-83%. Novel sling designs include mechanisms to manipulate the tension postoperatively and inside-out transobturator trocar passage. Common complications associated with slings are acute urinary retention and perineal pain. Rare complications include urethral erosion and infection. Retropubic approaches are associated with a risk of bladder perforation. SUMMARY: Male slings are a valid option for treating male stress incontinence, and do offer several advantages over the artificial urinary sphincter. However, long-term data and multicenter series are needed in order to compare directly with the artificial urinary sphincter. SN - 1473-6586 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20838219/Are_male_slings_for_post_prostatectomy_incontinence_a_valid_option L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833ecd09 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -