Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time.
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar; 96(2):247-62.JA

Abstract

We examined the influences of different facets of psychological collectivism (Preference, Reliance, Concern, Norm Acceptance, and Goal Priority) on team functioning at 3 different performance depictions: initial team performance, end-state team performance, and team performance change over time. We also tested the extent to which team-member exchange moderated the relationships between facets of psychological collectivism and performance change over time. Results from multilevel growth modeling of 66 teams (N = 264) engaged in a business simulation revealed differential effects across facets of psychological collectivism and across different performance measurements. Whereas facets concerned with affiliation (Preference and Concern) were positively related to initial team performance, reliance was negatively related to initial team performance. Goal Priority was a strong predictor of end-state performance. Team-member exchange moderated the relationship between performance change and 3 of the 5 facets of psychological collectivism (Preference, Reliance, Norm Acceptance). Implications for team composition and team training are discussed.

Links

Publisher Full Text
Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Dierdorff EC
Kellstadt Graduate School of Business, Department of Management, DePaul University, 1 East Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604-2287, USA. edierdor@depaul.edu
Bell ST
No affiliation info available
Belohlav JA
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AdultCommunicationCooperative BehaviorFemaleGoalsGroup ProcessesHumansLeadershipLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, OrganizationalModels, PsychologicalMotivationOrganizational CulturePower, PsychologicalStudentsTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20919792

Citation

Dierdorff, Erich C., et al. "The Power of "we": Effects of Psychological Collectivism On Team Performance Over Time." The Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 96, no. 2, 2011, pp. 247-62.
Dierdorff EC, Bell ST, Belohlav JA. The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(2):247-62.
Dierdorff, E. C., Bell, S. T., & Belohlav, J. A. (2011). The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 247-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020929
Dierdorff EC, Bell ST, Belohlav JA. The Power of "we": Effects of Psychological Collectivism On Team Performance Over Time. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(2):247-62. PubMed PMID: 20919792.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. AU - Dierdorff,Erich C, AU - Bell,Suzanne T, AU - Belohlav,James A, PY - 2010/10/6/entrez PY - 2010/10/6/pubmed PY - 2011/8/5/medline SP - 247 EP - 62 JF - The Journal of applied psychology JO - J Appl Psychol VL - 96 IS - 2 N2 - We examined the influences of different facets of psychological collectivism (Preference, Reliance, Concern, Norm Acceptance, and Goal Priority) on team functioning at 3 different performance depictions: initial team performance, end-state team performance, and team performance change over time. We also tested the extent to which team-member exchange moderated the relationships between facets of psychological collectivism and performance change over time. Results from multilevel growth modeling of 66 teams (N = 264) engaged in a business simulation revealed differential effects across facets of psychological collectivism and across different performance measurements. Whereas facets concerned with affiliation (Preference and Concern) were positively related to initial team performance, reliance was negatively related to initial team performance. Goal Priority was a strong predictor of end-state performance. Team-member exchange moderated the relationship between performance change and 3 of the 5 facets of psychological collectivism (Preference, Reliance, Norm Acceptance). Implications for team composition and team training are discussed. SN - 1939-1854 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20919792/The_power_of_"we":_effects_of_psychological_collectivism_on_team_performance_over_time_ L2 - http://content.apa.org/journals/apl/96/2/247 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -