Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Exposure risk assessment and evaluation of the best management practice for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields. Part 2: model simulation for the herbicide pretilachlor.
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Jan; 67(1):70-6.PM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring studies revealed high concentrations of pesticides in the drainage canal of paddy fields. It is important to have a way to predict these concentrations in different management scenarios as an assessment tool. A simulation model for predicting the pesticide concentration in a paddy block (PCPF-B) was evaluated and then used to assess the effect of water management practices for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields.

RESULTS

The PCPF-B model achieved an acceptable performance. The model was applied to a constrained probabilistic approach using the Monte Carlo technique to evaluate the best management practices for reducing runoff of pretilachlor into the canal. The probabilistic model predictions using actual data of pesticide use and hydrological data in the canal showed that the water holding period (WHP) and the excess water storage depth (EWSD) effectively reduced the loss and concentration of pretilachlor from paddy fields to the drainage canal. The WHP also reduced the timespan of pesticide exposure in the drainage canal.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that: (1) the WHP be applied for as long as possible, but for at least 7 days, depending on the pesticide and field conditions; (2) an EWSD greater than 2 cm be maintained to store substantial rainfall in order to prevent paddy runoff, especially during the WHP.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Bioproduction Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

20954170

Citation

Phong, Thai Khanh, et al. "Exposure Risk Assessment and Evaluation of the Best Management Practice for Controlling Pesticide Runoff From Paddy Fields. Part 2: Model Simulation for the Herbicide Pretilachlor." Pest Management Science, vol. 67, no. 1, 2011, pp. 70-6.
Phong TK, Vu SH, Ishihara S, et al. Exposure risk assessment and evaluation of the best management practice for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields. Part 2: model simulation for the herbicide pretilachlor. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67(1):70-6.
Phong, T. K., Vu, S. H., Ishihara, S., Hiramatsu, K., & Watanabe, H. (2011). Exposure risk assessment and evaluation of the best management practice for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields. Part 2: model simulation for the herbicide pretilachlor. Pest Management Science, 67(1), 70-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2033
Phong TK, et al. Exposure Risk Assessment and Evaluation of the Best Management Practice for Controlling Pesticide Runoff From Paddy Fields. Part 2: Model Simulation for the Herbicide Pretilachlor. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67(1):70-6. PubMed PMID: 20954170.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Exposure risk assessment and evaluation of the best management practice for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields. Part 2: model simulation for the herbicide pretilachlor. AU - Phong,Thai Khanh, AU - Vu,Son Hong, AU - Ishihara,Satoru, AU - Hiramatsu,Kazuaki, AU - Watanabe,Hirozumi, Y1 - 2010/10/15/ PY - 2010/02/25/received PY - 2010/03/28/revised PY - 2010/07/02/accepted PY - 2010/10/19/entrez PY - 2010/10/19/pubmed PY - 2011/4/26/medline SP - 70 EP - 6 JF - Pest management science JO - Pest Manag Sci VL - 67 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Monitoring studies revealed high concentrations of pesticides in the drainage canal of paddy fields. It is important to have a way to predict these concentrations in different management scenarios as an assessment tool. A simulation model for predicting the pesticide concentration in a paddy block (PCPF-B) was evaluated and then used to assess the effect of water management practices for controlling pesticide runoff from paddy fields. RESULTS: The PCPF-B model achieved an acceptable performance. The model was applied to a constrained probabilistic approach using the Monte Carlo technique to evaluate the best management practices for reducing runoff of pretilachlor into the canal. The probabilistic model predictions using actual data of pesticide use and hydrological data in the canal showed that the water holding period (WHP) and the excess water storage depth (EWSD) effectively reduced the loss and concentration of pretilachlor from paddy fields to the drainage canal. The WHP also reduced the timespan of pesticide exposure in the drainage canal. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that: (1) the WHP be applied for as long as possible, but for at least 7 days, depending on the pesticide and field conditions; (2) an EWSD greater than 2 cm be maintained to store substantial rainfall in order to prevent paddy runoff, especially during the WHP. SN - 1526-4998 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/20954170/Exposure_risk_assessment_and_evaluation_of_the_best_management_practice_for_controlling_pesticide_runoff_from_paddy_fields__Part_2:_model_simulation_for_the_herbicide_pretilachlor_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2033 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -