Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape when combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Feb; 112(2):122-5.IJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment outcomes of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape (TOT) when each is combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

Consecutive cases of Burch colposuspension and TOT combined with ASC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with SUI and POP beyond stage III--according to the POP-quantification system--were included.

RESULTS

Mean hospital stay was longer in the Burch group (n=49) than in the TOT group (n=60) (11.3 vs 7.8 days; P<0.001), as was operation time (202.7 vs 170.1 minutes; P<0.001); furthermore, there were higher rates of urinary retention (53.1% vs 11.7%; P<0.001), de novo urgency (18.4% vs 3.3%; P=0.01), and recurrent SUI (18.4% vs 1.7%; P=0.003) in the Burch group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the TOT group than in the Burch group (98.3% vs 69.7%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of TOT with ASC resulted in higher cure rates and better functional outcomes than did Burch colposuspension with ASC.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University Health System, System, Seongsan-ro 250, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21130442

Citation

Moon, Yeo-Jung, et al. "Comparison of Burch Colposuspension and Transobturator Tape when Combined With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy." International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 112, no. 2, 2011, pp. 122-5.
Moon YJ, Jeon MJ, Kim SK, et al. Comparison of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape when combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112(2):122-5.
Moon, Y. J., Jeon, M. J., Kim, S. K., & Bai, S. W. (2011). Comparison of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape when combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 112(2), 122-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.08.017
Moon YJ, et al. Comparison of Burch Colposuspension and Transobturator Tape when Combined With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112(2):122-5. PubMed PMID: 21130442.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape when combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. AU - Moon,Yeo-Jung, AU - Jeon,Myung-Jae, AU - Kim,Sei-Kwang, AU - Bai,Sang-Wook, Y1 - 2010/12/04/ PY - 2010/06/17/received PY - 2010/08/27/revised PY - 2010/10/28/accepted PY - 2010/12/7/entrez PY - 2010/12/7/pubmed PY - 2011/4/13/medline SP - 122 EP - 5 JF - International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics JO - Int J Gynaecol Obstet VL - 112 IS - 2 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape (TOT) when each is combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Consecutive cases of Burch colposuspension and TOT combined with ASC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with SUI and POP beyond stage III--according to the POP-quantification system--were included. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was longer in the Burch group (n=49) than in the TOT group (n=60) (11.3 vs 7.8 days; P<0.001), as was operation time (202.7 vs 170.1 minutes; P<0.001); furthermore, there were higher rates of urinary retention (53.1% vs 11.7%; P<0.001), de novo urgency (18.4% vs 3.3%; P=0.01), and recurrent SUI (18.4% vs 1.7%; P=0.003) in the Burch group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the TOT group than in the Burch group (98.3% vs 69.7%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of TOT with ASC resulted in higher cure rates and better functional outcomes than did Burch colposuspension with ASC. SN - 1879-3479 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21130442/Comparison_of_Burch_colposuspension_and_transobturator_tape_when_combined_with_abdominal_sacrocolpopexy_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020-7292(10)00499-6 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -