Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the predictive value of the Suicide Intent Scale in patients with high suicide risk. The secondary aim was to assess if the use of the factors of the Suicide Intent Scale may offer a better predictive value in suicide risk detection. Finally a shorter version of the scale was created after an item analysis.
METHOD
Eighty-one suicide attempters were assessed with the Beck's Suicide Intent Scale (SIS). All patients were followed up for cause of death. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and tables were created to establish the optimal cut-off values for SIS and SIS factors to predict suicide.
RESULTS
Seven patients committed suicide during a mean follow up of 9.5 years. The major finding was that mean SIS scores distinguished between suicides and survivors. The positive predictive value was 16.7% and the Area Under Curve (AUC) was 0.74. Only the planning subscale reached statistical significance. Four items were used to test a shorter version of the SIS in the suicide prediction. The positive predictive value was 19% and the AUC was 0.82.
CONCLUSIONS
The Suicide Intent Scale is a valuable tool in clinical suicide risk assessment, a shorter version of the scale may offer a better predictive value.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Suicide Intent Scale in the prediction of suicide.
AU - Stefansson,J,
AU - Nordström,P,
AU - Jokinen,J,
Y1 - 2010/12/08/
PY - 2010/10/13/received
PY - 2010/11/15/revised
PY - 2010/11/15/accepted
PY - 2010/12/15/entrez
PY - 2010/12/15/pubmed
PY - 2012/4/27/medline
SP - 167
EP - 171
JF - Journal of affective disorders
JO - J Affect Disord
VL - 136
IS - 1-2
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of the Suicide Intent Scale in patients with high suicide risk. The secondary aim was to assess if the use of the factors of the Suicide Intent Scale may offer a better predictive value in suicide risk detection. Finally a shorter version of the scale was created after an item analysis. METHOD: Eighty-one suicide attempters were assessed with the Beck's Suicide Intent Scale (SIS). All patients were followed up for cause of death. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and tables were created to establish the optimal cut-off values for SIS and SIS factors to predict suicide. RESULTS: Seven patients committed suicide during a mean follow up of 9.5 years. The major finding was that mean SIS scores distinguished between suicides and survivors. The positive predictive value was 16.7% and the Area Under Curve (AUC) was 0.74. Only the planning subscale reached statistical significance. Four items were used to test a shorter version of the SIS in the suicide prediction. The positive predictive value was 19% and the AUC was 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: The Suicide Intent Scale is a valuable tool in clinical suicide risk assessment, a shorter version of the scale may offer a better predictive value.
SN - 1573-2517
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21144592/Suicide_Intent_Scale_in_the_prediction_of_suicide_
L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165-0327(10)00711-1
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -