Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements.
J Sports Sci. 2011 Mar; 29(5):533-8.JS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare one-repetition maximum (1-RM) and muscle activity in three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements (Smith machine, barbell, and dumbbells). Twelve healthy, resistance-trained males (age 22.7 ± 1.7 years, body mass 78.6 ± 7.6 kg, stature 1.80 ± 0.06 m) were tested for 1-RM of the three chest-press exercises in counterbalanced order with 3-5 days of rest between the exercises. One-repetition maximum and electromyographic activity of the pectoralis major, deltoid anterior, biceps, and triceps brachii were recorded in the exercises. The dumbbell load was 14% less than that for the Smith machine (P ≤ 0.001, effect size [ES] = 1.05) and 17% less than that for the barbell (P ≤ 0.001, ES = 1.11). The barbell load was ∼3% higher than that for the Smith machine (P = 0.016, ES = 0.18). Electrical activity in the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid did not differ during the lifts. Electrical activity in the biceps brachii increased with stability requirements (i.e. Smith machine <barbell <dumbbells; P ≤ 0.005; ES = 0.57, 1.46, and 2.00, respectively), while triceps brachii activity was reduced using dumbbells versus barbell (P = 0.007, ES = 0.73) and dumbbells versus Smith machine (P = 0.003, ES = 0.62). In conclusion, high stability requirements in the chest press (dumbbells) result in similar (pectoralis major and anterior deltoid), lower (triceps brachii) or higher (biceps brachii) muscle activity. These findings have implications for athletic training and rehabilitation.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Faculty of Teacher Education and Sports, Sogn og Fjordane University College, Sogndal, Norway. atle.saeterbakken@hisf.noNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21225489

Citation

Saeterbakken, Atle H., et al. "A Comparison of Muscle Activity and 1-RM Strength of Three Chest-press Exercises With Different Stability Requirements." Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 29, no. 5, 2011, pp. 533-8.
Saeterbakken AH, van den Tillaar R, Fimland MS. A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(5):533-8.
Saeterbakken, A. H., van den Tillaar, R., & Fimland, M. S. (2011). A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(5), 533-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.543916
Saeterbakken AH, van den Tillaar R, Fimland MS. A Comparison of Muscle Activity and 1-RM Strength of Three Chest-press Exercises With Different Stability Requirements. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(5):533-8. PubMed PMID: 21225489.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements. AU - Saeterbakken,Atle H, AU - van den Tillaar,Roland, AU - Fimland,Marius S, PY - 2011/1/13/entrez PY - 2011/1/13/pubmed PY - 2011/6/9/medline SP - 533 EP - 8 JF - Journal of sports sciences JO - J Sports Sci VL - 29 IS - 5 N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare one-repetition maximum (1-RM) and muscle activity in three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements (Smith machine, barbell, and dumbbells). Twelve healthy, resistance-trained males (age 22.7 ± 1.7 years, body mass 78.6 ± 7.6 kg, stature 1.80 ± 0.06 m) were tested for 1-RM of the three chest-press exercises in counterbalanced order with 3-5 days of rest between the exercises. One-repetition maximum and electromyographic activity of the pectoralis major, deltoid anterior, biceps, and triceps brachii were recorded in the exercises. The dumbbell load was 14% less than that for the Smith machine (P ≤ 0.001, effect size [ES] = 1.05) and 17% less than that for the barbell (P ≤ 0.001, ES = 1.11). The barbell load was ∼3% higher than that for the Smith machine (P = 0.016, ES = 0.18). Electrical activity in the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid did not differ during the lifts. Electrical activity in the biceps brachii increased with stability requirements (i.e. Smith machine <barbell <dumbbells; P ≤ 0.005; ES = 0.57, 1.46, and 2.00, respectively), while triceps brachii activity was reduced using dumbbells versus barbell (P = 0.007, ES = 0.73) and dumbbells versus Smith machine (P = 0.003, ES = 0.62). In conclusion, high stability requirements in the chest press (dumbbells) result in similar (pectoralis major and anterior deltoid), lower (triceps brachii) or higher (biceps brachii) muscle activity. These findings have implications for athletic training and rehabilitation. SN - 1466-447X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21225489/A_comparison_of_muscle_activity_and_1_RM_strength_of_three_chest_press_exercises_with_different_stability_requirements_ L2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2010.543916 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -