Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun; 64(6):1138-56.QJ

Abstract

We report two experiments on the relationship between allocentric/egocentric frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations. Jager and Postma (2003) suggest two theoretical possibilities about their relationship: categorical judgements are better when combined with an allocentric reference frame and coordinate judgements with an egocentric reference frame (interaction hypothesis); allocentric/egocentric and categorical/coordinate form independent dimensions (independence hypothesis). Participants saw stimuli comprising two vertical bars (targets), one above and the other below a horizontal bar. They had to judge whether the targets appeared on the same side (categorical) or at the same distance (coordinate) with respect either to their body-midline (egocentric) or to the centre of the horizontal bar (allocentric). The results from Experiment 1 showed a facilitation in the allocentric and categorical conditions. In line with the independence hypothesis, no interaction effect emerged. To see whether the results were affected by the visual salience of the stimuli, in Experiment 2 the luminance of the horizontal bar was reduced. As a consequence, a significant interaction effect emerged indicating that categorical judgements were more accurate than coordinate ones, and especially so in the allocentric condition. Furthermore, egocentric judgements were as accurate as allocentric ones with a specific improvement when combined with coordinate spatial relations. The data from Experiment 2 showed that the visual salience of stimuli affected the relationship between allocentric/egocentric and categorical/coordinate dimensions. This suggests that the emergence of a selective interaction between the two dimensions may be modulated by the characteristics of the task.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. francesco.ruotolo@unina2.itNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21271464

Citation

Ruotolo, Francesco, et al. "The Relationship Between Allocentric and Egocentric Frames of Reference and Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Information Processing." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), vol. 64, no. 6, 2011, pp. 1138-56.
Ruotolo F, van der Ham IJ, Iachini T, et al. The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011;64(6):1138-56.
Ruotolo, F., van der Ham, I. J., Iachini, T., & Postma, A. (2011). The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 64(6), 1138-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.539700
Ruotolo F, et al. The Relationship Between Allocentric and Egocentric Frames of Reference and Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Information Processing. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011;64(6):1138-56. PubMed PMID: 21271464.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing. AU - Ruotolo,Francesco, AU - van der Ham,Ineke J M, AU - Iachini,Tina, AU - Postma,Albert, Y1 - 2011/01/24/ PY - 2011/1/29/entrez PY - 2011/1/29/pubmed PY - 2011/10/19/medline SP - 1138 EP - 56 JF - Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) JO - Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) VL - 64 IS - 6 N2 - We report two experiments on the relationship between allocentric/egocentric frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations. Jager and Postma (2003) suggest two theoretical possibilities about their relationship: categorical judgements are better when combined with an allocentric reference frame and coordinate judgements with an egocentric reference frame (interaction hypothesis); allocentric/egocentric and categorical/coordinate form independent dimensions (independence hypothesis). Participants saw stimuli comprising two vertical bars (targets), one above and the other below a horizontal bar. They had to judge whether the targets appeared on the same side (categorical) or at the same distance (coordinate) with respect either to their body-midline (egocentric) or to the centre of the horizontal bar (allocentric). The results from Experiment 1 showed a facilitation in the allocentric and categorical conditions. In line with the independence hypothesis, no interaction effect emerged. To see whether the results were affected by the visual salience of the stimuli, in Experiment 2 the luminance of the horizontal bar was reduced. As a consequence, a significant interaction effect emerged indicating that categorical judgements were more accurate than coordinate ones, and especially so in the allocentric condition. Furthermore, egocentric judgements were as accurate as allocentric ones with a specific improvement when combined with coordinate spatial relations. The data from Experiment 2 showed that the visual salience of stimuli affected the relationship between allocentric/egocentric and categorical/coordinate dimensions. This suggests that the emergence of a selective interaction between the two dimensions may be modulated by the characteristics of the task. SN - 1747-0226 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21271464/The_relationship_between_allocentric_and_egocentric_frames_of_reference_and_categorical_and_coordinate_spatial_information_processing_ L2 - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1080/17470218.2010.539700?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -