Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Pneumatic performance of the Boussignac CPAP system in healthy humans.
Respir Care. 2011 Jun; 56(6):818-26.RC

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device effectively treats acute pulmonary edema, but data on airway pressure with the Boussignac CPAP system are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Boussignac CPAP system's ability to maintain stable inspiratory and expiratory pressure levels, and to evaluate perceived exertion during breathing with the Boussignac CPAP system.

METHODS

With 18 healthy volunteers we recorded airway pressure and air flow during 10-min sessions at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 cm H(2)O. The participants were blinded to the sequence of the CPAP levels. Each session was ended with 10 forced breaths. We measured perceived exertion with the Borg category ratio 10 (Borg CR10) scale.

RESULTS

When the participants breathed at 20% of vital capacity and a peak expiratory flow of 14% of FEV(1), the maximum pressure difference between inspiration and expiration was 4.0 cm H(2)O at CPAP 10 cm H(2)O. The changes in airway pressure were never large enough to reduce airway pressure to below zero. During the forced breaths, the expiratory volume was 38-42% of vital capacity and peak expiratory flow was 49-56% of FEV(1). As air flow increased, both the drop in inspiratory airway pressure and the increase in expiratory airway pressure increased.

CONCLUSIONS

With CPAP, pressure changes are considered to be associated with increased work of breathing. The device's pneumatic performance is adequate during normal breathing with low air flow, but during forced breathing (high air flow) it did not maintain stable airway pressure, which could increase the work of breathing and cause respiratory fatigue. Thus, the Boussignac CPAP system might be less suitable for a patient breathing at a higher frequency.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. maria.sehlin@anestesi.umu.seNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21333088

Citation

Sehlin, Maria, et al. "Pneumatic Performance of the Boussignac CPAP System in Healthy Humans." Respiratory Care, vol. 56, no. 6, 2011, pp. 818-26.
Sehlin M, Törnell SS, Öhberg F, et al. Pneumatic performance of the Boussignac CPAP system in healthy humans. Respir Care. 2011;56(6):818-26.
Sehlin, M., Törnell, S. S., Öhberg, F., Johansson, G., & Winsö, O. (2011). Pneumatic performance of the Boussignac CPAP system in healthy humans. Respiratory Care, 56(6), 818-26. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01015
Sehlin M, et al. Pneumatic Performance of the Boussignac CPAP System in Healthy Humans. Respir Care. 2011;56(6):818-26. PubMed PMID: 21333088.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Pneumatic performance of the Boussignac CPAP system in healthy humans. AU - Sehlin,Maria, AU - Törnell,Siv Sandkvist, AU - Öhberg,Fredrik, AU - Johansson,Göran, AU - Winsö,Ola, Y1 - 2011/02/11/ PY - 2011/2/22/entrez PY - 2011/2/22/pubmed PY - 2011/7/27/medline SP - 818 EP - 26 JF - Respiratory care JO - Respir Care VL - 56 IS - 6 N2 - BACKGROUND: The Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device effectively treats acute pulmonary edema, but data on airway pressure with the Boussignac CPAP system are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Boussignac CPAP system's ability to maintain stable inspiratory and expiratory pressure levels, and to evaluate perceived exertion during breathing with the Boussignac CPAP system. METHODS: With 18 healthy volunteers we recorded airway pressure and air flow during 10-min sessions at 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 cm H(2)O. The participants were blinded to the sequence of the CPAP levels. Each session was ended with 10 forced breaths. We measured perceived exertion with the Borg category ratio 10 (Borg CR10) scale. RESULTS: When the participants breathed at 20% of vital capacity and a peak expiratory flow of 14% of FEV(1), the maximum pressure difference between inspiration and expiration was 4.0 cm H(2)O at CPAP 10 cm H(2)O. The changes in airway pressure were never large enough to reduce airway pressure to below zero. During the forced breaths, the expiratory volume was 38-42% of vital capacity and peak expiratory flow was 49-56% of FEV(1). As air flow increased, both the drop in inspiratory airway pressure and the increase in expiratory airway pressure increased. CONCLUSIONS: With CPAP, pressure changes are considered to be associated with increased work of breathing. The device's pneumatic performance is adequate during normal breathing with low air flow, but during forced breathing (high air flow) it did not maintain stable airway pressure, which could increase the work of breathing and cause respiratory fatigue. Thus, the Boussignac CPAP system might be less suitable for a patient breathing at a higher frequency. SN - 0020-1324 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21333088/Pneumatic_performance_of_the_Boussignac_CPAP_system_in_healthy_humans_ L2 - http://rc.rcjournal.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=21333088 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -