Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul; 25(7):1879-88.JS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the applicability of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale as a means of controlling resistance training intensity and establishing the relationship between the RPE value, load, and mechanical power (MP) produced during the bench press. Eleven men (22.1 ± 1.0 years) were evaluated on 8 separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) value, each subject underwent 7 tests until achieving muscular failure with the following percentage ranges: 30-40, >40-50, >50-60, >60-70, >70-80, >80-90, and >90%. A rotary encoder and the OMNI-RES (0-10) scale were used to estimate the power and to determine the perception of effort (RPE) expressed after each repetition of each set. The RPE produced from the start to the end of each set was related to the percentage of the load and the variability of the MP measured. Additionally, except for the >90% range, significant differences (p < 0.05) between the initial RPE (RPE I) and the average RPE of the first 3 repetitions (RPE 1_3 rep) with respect to the RPE produced with a 10% reduction in MP were identified for all the ranges. These relationships demonstrate the utility of RPE for controlling resistance training intensity.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Fundaments of Motricity and Training, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid (UEM), Madrid, Spain. fernando.naclerio@uem.esNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21399534

Citation

Naclerio, Fernando, et al. "Control of Resistance Training Intensity By the OMNI Perceived Exertion Scale." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 25, no. 7, 2011, pp. 1879-88.
Naclerio F, Rodríguez-Romo G, Barriopedro-Moro MI, et al. Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(7):1879-88.
Naclerio, F., Rodríguez-Romo, G., Barriopedro-Moro, M. I., Jiménez, A., Alvar, B. A., & Triplett, N. T. (2011). Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(7), 1879-88. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e501e9
Naclerio F, et al. Control of Resistance Training Intensity By the OMNI Perceived Exertion Scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(7):1879-88. PubMed PMID: 21399534.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale. AU - Naclerio,Fernando, AU - Rodríguez-Romo,Gabriel, AU - Barriopedro-Moro,Maria I, AU - Jiménez,Alfonso, AU - Alvar,Brent A, AU - Triplett,N Travis, PY - 2011/3/15/entrez PY - 2011/3/15/pubmed PY - 2011/12/13/medline SP - 1879 EP - 88 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 25 IS - 7 N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the applicability of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale as a means of controlling resistance training intensity and establishing the relationship between the RPE value, load, and mechanical power (MP) produced during the bench press. Eleven men (22.1 ± 1.0 years) were evaluated on 8 separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) value, each subject underwent 7 tests until achieving muscular failure with the following percentage ranges: 30-40, >40-50, >50-60, >60-70, >70-80, >80-90, and >90%. A rotary encoder and the OMNI-RES (0-10) scale were used to estimate the power and to determine the perception of effort (RPE) expressed after each repetition of each set. The RPE produced from the start to the end of each set was related to the percentage of the load and the variability of the MP measured. Additionally, except for the >90% range, significant differences (p < 0.05) between the initial RPE (RPE I) and the average RPE of the first 3 repetitions (RPE 1_3 rep) with respect to the RPE produced with a 10% reduction in MP were identified for all the ranges. These relationships demonstrate the utility of RPE for controlling resistance training intensity. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21399534/Control_of_resistance_training_intensity_by_the_OMNI_perceived_exertion_scale_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -