Prime

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of F(ST) outlier tests for SNP loci under selection.

Abstract

Genome scans with many genetic markers provide the opportunity to investigate local adaptation in natural populations and identify candidate genes under selection. In particular, SNPs are dense throughout the genome of most organisms and are commonly observed in functional genes making them ideal markers to study adaptive molecular variation. This approach has become commonly employed in ecological and population genetics studies to detect outlier loci that are putatively under selection. However, there are several challenges to address with outlier approaches including genotyping errors, underlying population structure and false positives, variation in mutation rate and limited sensitivity (false negatives). In this study, we evaluated multiple outlier tests and their type I (false positive) and type II (false negative) error rates in a series of simulated data sets. Comparisons included simulation procedures (FDIST2, ARLEQUIN v.3.5 and BAYESCAN) as well as more conventional tools such as global F(ST) histograms. Of the three simulation methods, FDIST2 and BAYESCAN typically had the lowest type II error, BAYESCAN had the least type I error and Arlequin had highest type I and II error. High error rates in Arlequin with a hierarchical approach were partially because of confounding scenarios where patterns of adaptive variation were contrary to neutral structure; however, Arlequin consistently had highest type I and type II error in all four simulation scenarios tested in this study. Given the results provided here, it is important that outlier loci are interpreted cautiously and error rates of various methods are taken into consideration in studies of adaptive molecular variation, especially when hierarchical structure is included.

Links

  • Aggregator Full Text
  • Authors

    ,

    Source

    Molecular ecology resources 11 Suppl 1: 2011 Mar pg 184-94

    MeSH

    Computer Simulation
    Gene Frequency
    Genetic Association Studies
    Genetic Markers
    Genome
    Models, Genetic
    Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
    Selection, Genetic
    Software

    Pub Type(s)

    Comparative Study
    Evaluation Studies
    Journal Article

    Language

    eng

    PubMed ID

    21429174