Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale.
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec; 15(3):559-76.NC

Abstract

The December 2003 report from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Workshop on priorities for clinical research in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) recommended clinical trials for evaluation of blood pressure management in acute ICH as a leading priority. The Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association in 1999 and 2007 emphasized the need for clinical trials to ensure evidence-based treatment of acute hypertensive response in ICH. To address important gaps in knowledge, we conducted a pilot study funded by the NINDS, Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) I Trial, during 2004-2008 to determine the appropriate level of systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction. We now have initiated a multi-center, randomized Phase III trial, the ATACH II Trial, to definitively determine the efficacy of early, intensive, antihypertensive treatment using intravenous (IV) nicardipine initiated within 3 h of onset of ICH and continued for the next 24 h in subjects with spontaneous supratentorial ICH. The primary hypothesis of this large (N = 1,280), streamlined, and focused trial is that SBP reduction to ≤140 mm Hg reduces the likelihood of death or disability at 3 months after ICH, defined by modified Rankin scale score of 4-6, by at least 10% absolute compared to standard SBP reduction to ≤180 mm Hg. The ATACH II trial is a natural extension of numerous case series, the subsequent ATACH I pilot trial, and a preliminary, randomized, and controlled trial in this patient population funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Both trials recently confirmed the safety and tolerability of both the regimen and goals of antihypertensive treatment in acutely hypertensive patients with ICH, as proposed in the present trial. The underlying mechanism for this expected beneficial effect of intensive treatment is presumably mediated through reduction of the rate and magnitude of hematoma expansion observed in approximately 73% of the patients with acute ICH. The Australian trial provided preliminary evidence of attenuation of hematoma expansion with intensive SBP reduction. The ATACH II trial will have important public health implications by providing evidence of, or lack thereof, regarding the efficacy and safety of acute antihypertensive treatment in subjects with ICH. This treatment represents a strategy that can be made widely available without the need for specialized equipment and personnel, and therefore, can make a major impact upon clinical practice for treating patients with ICH.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. aiqureshi@hotmail.comNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21626077

Citation

Qureshi, A I., and Y Y. Palesch. "Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: Design, Methods, and Rationale." Neurocritical Care, vol. 15, no. 3, 2011, pp. 559-76.
Qureshi AI, Palesch YY. Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):559-76.
Qureshi, A. I., & Palesch, Y. Y. (2011). Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale. Neurocritical Care, 15(3), 559-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9538-3
Qureshi AI, Palesch YY. Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: Design, Methods, and Rationale. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):559-76. PubMed PMID: 21626077.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale. AU - Qureshi,A I, AU - Palesch,Y Y, PY - 2011/6/1/entrez PY - 2011/6/1/pubmed PY - 2012/5/5/medline SP - 559 EP - 76 JF - Neurocritical care JO - Neurocrit Care VL - 15 IS - 3 N2 - The December 2003 report from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Workshop on priorities for clinical research in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) recommended clinical trials for evaluation of blood pressure management in acute ICH as a leading priority. The Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association in 1999 and 2007 emphasized the need for clinical trials to ensure evidence-based treatment of acute hypertensive response in ICH. To address important gaps in knowledge, we conducted a pilot study funded by the NINDS, Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) I Trial, during 2004-2008 to determine the appropriate level of systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction. We now have initiated a multi-center, randomized Phase III trial, the ATACH II Trial, to definitively determine the efficacy of early, intensive, antihypertensive treatment using intravenous (IV) nicardipine initiated within 3 h of onset of ICH and continued for the next 24 h in subjects with spontaneous supratentorial ICH. The primary hypothesis of this large (N = 1,280), streamlined, and focused trial is that SBP reduction to ≤140 mm Hg reduces the likelihood of death or disability at 3 months after ICH, defined by modified Rankin scale score of 4-6, by at least 10% absolute compared to standard SBP reduction to ≤180 mm Hg. The ATACH II trial is a natural extension of numerous case series, the subsequent ATACH I pilot trial, and a preliminary, randomized, and controlled trial in this patient population funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Both trials recently confirmed the safety and tolerability of both the regimen and goals of antihypertensive treatment in acutely hypertensive patients with ICH, as proposed in the present trial. The underlying mechanism for this expected beneficial effect of intensive treatment is presumably mediated through reduction of the rate and magnitude of hematoma expansion observed in approximately 73% of the patients with acute ICH. The Australian trial provided preliminary evidence of attenuation of hematoma expansion with intensive SBP reduction. The ATACH II trial will have important public health implications by providing evidence of, or lack thereof, regarding the efficacy and safety of acute antihypertensive treatment in subjects with ICH. This treatment represents a strategy that can be made widely available without the need for specialized equipment and personnel, and therefore, can make a major impact upon clinical practice for treating patients with ICH. SN - 1556-0961 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21626077/Antihypertensive_Treatment_of_Acute_Cerebral_Hemorrhage__ATACH__II:_design_methods_and_rationale_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9538-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -