Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec; 25(12):3378-84.JS

Abstract

Parchmann, CJ and McBride, JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3378-3384, 2011-Tests such as the functional movement screen (FMS) and maximal strength (repetition maximum strength [1RM]) have been theorized to assist in predicting athletic performance capabilities. Some data exist concerning 1RM and athletic performance, but very limited data exist concerning the potential ability of FMS to assess athletic performance. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if FMS scores or 1RM is related to athletic performance, specifically in Division I golfers in terms of sprint times, vertical jump (VJ) height, agility T-test times, and club head velocity. Twenty-five National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I golfers (15 men, age = 20.0 ± 1.2 years, height = 176.8 ± 5.6 cm, body mass = 76.5 ± 13.4 kg, squat 1RM = 97.1 ± 21.0 kg) (10 women, age = 20.5 ± 0.8 years, height = 167.0 ± 5.6 cm, body mass = 70.7 ± 21.5 kg, squat 1RM = 50.3 ± 16.6) performed an FMS, 1RM testing, and field tests common in assessing athletic performance. Athletic performance tests included 10- and 20-m sprint time, VJ height, agility T-test time, and club head velocity. Strength testing included a 1RM back squat. Data for 1RM testing were normalized to body mass for comparisons. Correlations were determined between FMS, 1RMs, and athletic performance tests using Pearson product correlation coefficients (p ≤ 0.05). No significant correlations existed between FMS and 10-m sprint time (r = -0.136), 20-m sprint time (r = -0.107), VJ height (r = 0.249), agility T-test time (r = -0.146), and club head velocity (r = -0.064). The 1RM in the squat was significantly correlated to 10-m sprint time (r = -0.812), 20-m sprint time (r = -0.872), VJ height (r = 0.869), agility T-test time (r = -0.758), and club head velocity (r = 0.805). The lack of relationship suggests that FMS is not an adequate field test and does not relate to any aspect of athletic performance. Based on the data from this investigation, 1RM squat strength appears to be a good indicator of athletic performance.

Links

Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Parchmann CJ
Neuromuscular and Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health, Leisure and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA.
McBride JM
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AdolescentAdultAthletic PerformanceExercise TestFemaleGolfHumansMaleMotor SkillsMovementMuscle StrengthPredictive Value of TestsRunningYoung Adult

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

21964425

Citation

Parchmann, Christopher J., and Jeffrey M. McBride. "Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen and Athletic Performance." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 25, no. 12, 2011, pp. 3378-84.
Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(12):3378-84.
Parchmann, C. J., & McBride, J. M. (2011). Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(12), 3378-84. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318238e916
Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen and Athletic Performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(12):3378-84. PubMed PMID: 21964425.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. AU - Parchmann,Christopher J, AU - McBride,Jeffrey M, PY - 2011/10/4/entrez PY - 2011/10/4/pubmed PY - 2012/4/12/medline SP - 3378 EP - 84 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 25 IS - 12 N2 - Parchmann, CJ and McBride, JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3378-3384, 2011-Tests such as the functional movement screen (FMS) and maximal strength (repetition maximum strength [1RM]) have been theorized to assist in predicting athletic performance capabilities. Some data exist concerning 1RM and athletic performance, but very limited data exist concerning the potential ability of FMS to assess athletic performance. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if FMS scores or 1RM is related to athletic performance, specifically in Division I golfers in terms of sprint times, vertical jump (VJ) height, agility T-test times, and club head velocity. Twenty-five National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I golfers (15 men, age = 20.0 ± 1.2 years, height = 176.8 ± 5.6 cm, body mass = 76.5 ± 13.4 kg, squat 1RM = 97.1 ± 21.0 kg) (10 women, age = 20.5 ± 0.8 years, height = 167.0 ± 5.6 cm, body mass = 70.7 ± 21.5 kg, squat 1RM = 50.3 ± 16.6) performed an FMS, 1RM testing, and field tests common in assessing athletic performance. Athletic performance tests included 10- and 20-m sprint time, VJ height, agility T-test time, and club head velocity. Strength testing included a 1RM back squat. Data for 1RM testing were normalized to body mass for comparisons. Correlations were determined between FMS, 1RMs, and athletic performance tests using Pearson product correlation coefficients (p ≤ 0.05). No significant correlations existed between FMS and 10-m sprint time (r = -0.136), 20-m sprint time (r = -0.107), VJ height (r = 0.249), agility T-test time (r = -0.146), and club head velocity (r = -0.064). The 1RM in the squat was significantly correlated to 10-m sprint time (r = -0.812), 20-m sprint time (r = -0.872), VJ height (r = 0.869), agility T-test time (r = -0.758), and club head velocity (r = 0.805). The lack of relationship suggests that FMS is not an adequate field test and does not relate to any aspect of athletic performance. Based on the data from this investigation, 1RM squat strength appears to be a good indicator of athletic performance. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/21964425/Relationship_between_functional_movement_screen_and_athletic_performance_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318238e916 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -