Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 01; 36(25 Suppl):S187-93.S

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Review of whiplash injury mechanisms and effects of anti-whiplash systems including active head restraint (AHR) and Whiplash Protection System (WHIPS).

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of previous biomechanical and epidemiological studies of AHR and WHIPS and investigates whether seat design and biomechanical knowledge of proposed whiplash injury mechanisms translates to understanding outcomes of rear crash occupants.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In attempt to reduce whiplash injuries, some newer automobiles incorporate anti-whiplash systems such as AHR or WHIPS. During a rear crash, mechanically based systems activate by occupant momentum pressing into the seatback whereas electronically based systems activate using crash sensors and an electronic control unit linked to the head restraint.

METHODS

To investigate the effects of AHR and WHIPS on occupant responses including head and neck loads and motions, biomechanical studies of simulated rear crashes have been performed using human volunteers, mathematical models, crash dummies, whole cadavers, and hybrid cadaveric/surrogate models. Epidemiological studies have evaluated the effects of AHR and WHIPS on reducing whiplash injury claims and lessening subjective complaints of neck pain after rear crashes. RESULTS.: Biomechanical studies indicate that AHR and WHIPS reduced the potential for some whiplash injuries but did not completely eliminate the injury risk. Epidemiological outcomes indicate reduced whiplash injury claims or subjective complaints of crash-related neck pain between 43 and 75% due to AHR and between 21% and 49% due to WHIPS as compared to conventional seats and head restraints.

CONCLUSION

Yielding energy-absorbing seats aim to reduce occupant loads and accelerations whereas AHRs aim to provide early head support to minimize head and neck motions. Continued objective biomechanical and epidemiological studies of anti-whiplash systems together with industry, governmental, and clinical initiatives will ultimately lead to reduced whiplash injuries through improved prevention strategies.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USA. paul.ivancic@yale.edu

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

22020611

Citation

Ivancic, Paul C.. "Does Knowledge of Seat Design and Whiplash Injury Mechanisms Translate to Understanding Outcomes?" Spine, vol. 36, no. 25 Suppl, 2011, pp. S187-93.
Ivancic PC. Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(25 Suppl):S187-93.
Ivancic, P. C. (2011). Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes? Spine, 36(25 Suppl), S187-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387eff
Ivancic PC. Does Knowledge of Seat Design and Whiplash Injury Mechanisms Translate to Understanding Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S187-93. PubMed PMID: 22020611.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes? A1 - Ivancic,Paul C, PY - 2011/10/25/entrez PY - 2011/10/25/pubmed PY - 2012/4/6/medline SP - S187 EP - 93 JF - Spine JO - Spine (Phila Pa 1976) VL - 36 IS - 25 Suppl N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Review of whiplash injury mechanisms and effects of anti-whiplash systems including active head restraint (AHR) and Whiplash Protection System (WHIPS). OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview of previous biomechanical and epidemiological studies of AHR and WHIPS and investigates whether seat design and biomechanical knowledge of proposed whiplash injury mechanisms translates to understanding outcomes of rear crash occupants. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In attempt to reduce whiplash injuries, some newer automobiles incorporate anti-whiplash systems such as AHR or WHIPS. During a rear crash, mechanically based systems activate by occupant momentum pressing into the seatback whereas electronically based systems activate using crash sensors and an electronic control unit linked to the head restraint. METHODS: To investigate the effects of AHR and WHIPS on occupant responses including head and neck loads and motions, biomechanical studies of simulated rear crashes have been performed using human volunteers, mathematical models, crash dummies, whole cadavers, and hybrid cadaveric/surrogate models. Epidemiological studies have evaluated the effects of AHR and WHIPS on reducing whiplash injury claims and lessening subjective complaints of neck pain after rear crashes. RESULTS.: Biomechanical studies indicate that AHR and WHIPS reduced the potential for some whiplash injuries but did not completely eliminate the injury risk. Epidemiological outcomes indicate reduced whiplash injury claims or subjective complaints of crash-related neck pain between 43 and 75% due to AHR and between 21% and 49% due to WHIPS as compared to conventional seats and head restraints. CONCLUSION: Yielding energy-absorbing seats aim to reduce occupant loads and accelerations whereas AHRs aim to provide early head support to minimize head and neck motions. Continued objective biomechanical and epidemiological studies of anti-whiplash systems together with industry, governmental, and clinical initiatives will ultimately lead to reduced whiplash injuries through improved prevention strategies. SN - 1528-1159 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22020611/Does_knowledge_of_seat_design_and_whiplash_injury_mechanisms_translate_to_understanding_outcomes L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387eff DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -