Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Comparation of effect and cost-benefit analysis between acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity].
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 2011; 31(10):883-6ZZ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effect of acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity and evaluate the economics benefit by cost-benefit analysis.

METHODS

Sixty cases were randomly devided into an acupoint catgut-embedding group and an electroacupuncture group, 30 cases in each group. Zhongwan (CV 12), Tianshu (ST 25), Daheng (SP 15), Shuifen (CV 9), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4), Zusanli (ST 36) and Ashi acupoints were selected as the main acupoints in both groups. The acupoint catgut-embedding group was treated with acupoint catgut-embedding, once each week, four weeks as a course for two courses. The electroacupuncture group was treated with electroacupuncture, three times each week for eight weeks.

RESULTS

1) The total effective rate in the acupoint catgut-embedding group was 90.0% (27/30) and in the electroacupuncture group was 86.7% (26/30), with the similar therapeutic effect between the two groups (P > 0.05). 2) The body mass, body mass index (BMI), waistline, hip circumference and waist-to-hip ratio in the two groups were all decreased significantly (all P < 0.05). 3) The total medical treatment cost in the acupoint catgut-embedding group was 61 500 yuan and the cost per patient was 2050 yuan, and in the electroacupuncture group, the total cost was 117 210 yuan and the cost per patient was 3907 yuan. The cost effect analysis showed that there were 1857 yuan of the cost per patient in the acupoint catgut-embedding group less than that in the electroacupuncture group.

CONCLUSION

Acupoint catgut-embedding has significant effect in treating simple obesity with low cost and fine economics benefit.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Rehabilitation, The Second People's Hospital of Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519020, Guangdong Province, China.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

chi

PubMed ID

22043672

Citation

Huang, Le-Chun, and Wen-Yu Pan. "[Comparation of Effect and Cost-benefit Analysis Between Acupoint Catgut-embedding and Electroacupuncture On Simple Obesity]." Zhongguo Zhen Jiu = Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, vol. 31, no. 10, 2011, pp. 883-6.
Huang LC, Pan WY. [Comparation of effect and cost-benefit analysis between acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2011;31(10):883-6.
Huang, L. C., & Pan, W. Y. (2011). [Comparation of effect and cost-benefit analysis between acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu = Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 31(10), pp. 883-6.
Huang LC, Pan WY. [Comparation of Effect and Cost-benefit Analysis Between Acupoint Catgut-embedding and Electroacupuncture On Simple Obesity]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2011;31(10):883-6. PubMed PMID: 22043672.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Comparation of effect and cost-benefit analysis between acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity]. AU - Huang,Le-Chun, AU - Pan,Wen-Yu, PY - 2011/11/3/entrez PY - 2011/11/3/pubmed PY - 2011/12/21/medline SP - 883 EP - 6 JF - Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion JO - Zhongguo Zhen Jiu VL - 31 IS - 10 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effect of acupoint catgut-embedding and electroacupuncture on simple obesity and evaluate the economics benefit by cost-benefit analysis. METHODS: Sixty cases were randomly devided into an acupoint catgut-embedding group and an electroacupuncture group, 30 cases in each group. Zhongwan (CV 12), Tianshu (ST 25), Daheng (SP 15), Shuifen (CV 9), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4), Zusanli (ST 36) and Ashi acupoints were selected as the main acupoints in both groups. The acupoint catgut-embedding group was treated with acupoint catgut-embedding, once each week, four weeks as a course for two courses. The electroacupuncture group was treated with electroacupuncture, three times each week for eight weeks. RESULTS: 1) The total effective rate in the acupoint catgut-embedding group was 90.0% (27/30) and in the electroacupuncture group was 86.7% (26/30), with the similar therapeutic effect between the two groups (P > 0.05). 2) The body mass, body mass index (BMI), waistline, hip circumference and waist-to-hip ratio in the two groups were all decreased significantly (all P < 0.05). 3) The total medical treatment cost in the acupoint catgut-embedding group was 61 500 yuan and the cost per patient was 2050 yuan, and in the electroacupuncture group, the total cost was 117 210 yuan and the cost per patient was 3907 yuan. The cost effect analysis showed that there were 1857 yuan of the cost per patient in the acupoint catgut-embedding group less than that in the electroacupuncture group. CONCLUSION: Acupoint catgut-embedding has significant effect in treating simple obesity with low cost and fine economics benefit. SN - 0255-2930 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22043672/[Comparation_of_effect_and_cost_benefit_analysis_between_acupoint_catgut_embedding_and_electroacupuncture_on_simple_obesity]_ L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/9028 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -