Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach.
Talanta. 2011 Oct 30; 86:356-61.T

Abstract

The volatile compositions of Melia azedarach were studied by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). The result was compared with that obtained by soxhlet extraction (SE) and ultrasonic extraction (UAE). 79 compounds were identified in this study, among which 64 compounds were first reported. The experimental parameters including fiber type (PDMS, PDMS-DVB and CAR-PDMS), desorption time, extraction temperature and time were investigated. 37 compounds were obtained by HS-SPME, including curcumene (33.25%), α-cadinol (11.16%), α-muurolene (8.72%), copaene (5.04%), β-bisabolene (3.41%), and α-selinene (2.97%). The result suggested that the HS-SPME method is a powerful analytic tool and complementary to traditional methods for the determination of the volatile compounds in Chinese herbs.

Authors+Show Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, 130022, PR China.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

22063551

Citation

Yang, Yanqin, et al. "Comparison of Headspace Solid-phase Microextraction With Conventional Extraction for the Analysis of the Volatile Components in Melia Azedarach." Talanta, vol. 86, 2011, pp. 356-61.
Yang Y, Xiao Y, Liu B, et al. Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach. Talanta. 2011;86:356-61.
Yang, Y., Xiao, Y., Liu, B., Fang, X., Yang, W., & Xu, J. (2011). Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach. Talanta, 86, 356-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.09.028
Yang Y, et al. Comparison of Headspace Solid-phase Microextraction With Conventional Extraction for the Analysis of the Volatile Components in Melia Azedarach. Talanta. 2011 Oct 30;86:356-61. PubMed PMID: 22063551.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction with conventional extraction for the analysis of the volatile components in Melia azedarach. AU - Yang,Yanqin, AU - Xiao,Yanmeng, AU - Liu,Baofeng, AU - Fang,Xuexun, AU - Yang,Wei, AU - Xu,Jingwei, Y1 - 2011/09/22/ PY - 2011/07/25/received PY - 2011/09/15/revised PY - 2011/09/18/accepted PY - 2011/11/9/entrez PY - 2011/11/9/pubmed PY - 2012/8/17/medline SP - 356 EP - 61 JF - Talanta JO - Talanta VL - 86 N2 - The volatile compositions of Melia azedarach were studied by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). The result was compared with that obtained by soxhlet extraction (SE) and ultrasonic extraction (UAE). 79 compounds were identified in this study, among which 64 compounds were first reported. The experimental parameters including fiber type (PDMS, PDMS-DVB and CAR-PDMS), desorption time, extraction temperature and time were investigated. 37 compounds were obtained by HS-SPME, including curcumene (33.25%), α-cadinol (11.16%), α-muurolene (8.72%), copaene (5.04%), β-bisabolene (3.41%), and α-selinene (2.97%). The result suggested that the HS-SPME method is a powerful analytic tool and complementary to traditional methods for the determination of the volatile compounds in Chinese herbs. SN - 1873-3573 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22063551/Comparison_of_headspace_solid_phase_microextraction_with_conventional_extraction_for_the_analysis_of_the_volatile_components_in_Melia_azedarach_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0039-9140(11)00833-2 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -