Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15; 37(11):E678-82.S

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The study design was cross-cultural adaptation and investigation of reliability and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to translate the CNFDS into Turkish language and assess its reliability and validity among patients with neck pain in Turkish population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The CNFDS is a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for disability, but there is no published the Turkish version of the CNFDS.

METHODS

One hundred one subjects who had chronic neck pain were included in this study. The CNFDS, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, and visual analogue scale were administered to all subjects.

RESULTS

For investigating test-retest reliability, correlation between CNFDS scores, applied at 1-week interval, intraclass correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.86 (95% confidence interval = 0.679-0.935). There was no difference between test-retest scores (P < 0.001). For investigating concurrent validity, correlation between total score of the CNFDS and the mean visual analogue scale was r = 0.73 (P < 0.001). Concurrent validity of the CNFDS was very good. For investigating construct validity, correlation between total score of the CNFDS and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale was r = 0.78 (P < 0.001). Construct validity of the CNFDS was also very good.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the CNFDS is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish people.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Mevlana (Rumi) University, Konya, Turkey. gyapali@mevlana.edu.trNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

22281488

Citation

Yapali, Gökmen, et al. "The Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: Turkish Version Study." Spine, vol. 37, no. 11, 2012, pp. E678-82.
Yapali G, Günel MK, Karahan S. The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(11):E678-82.
Yapali, G., Günel, M. K., & Karahan, S. (2012). The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study. Spine, 37(11), E678-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b549c
Yapali G, Günel MK, Karahan S. The Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: Turkish Version Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):E678-82. PubMed PMID: 22281488.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study. AU - Yapali,Gökmen, AU - Günel,Mintaze Kerem, AU - Karahan,Sevilay, PY - 2012/1/28/entrez PY - 2012/1/28/pubmed PY - 2012/9/8/medline SP - E678 EP - 82 JF - Spine JO - Spine (Phila Pa 1976) VL - 37 IS - 11 N2 - STUDY DESIGN: The study design was cross-cultural adaptation and investigation of reliability and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate the CNFDS into Turkish language and assess its reliability and validity among patients with neck pain in Turkish population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The CNFDS is a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for disability, but there is no published the Turkish version of the CNFDS. METHODS: One hundred one subjects who had chronic neck pain were included in this study. The CNFDS, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, and visual analogue scale were administered to all subjects. RESULTS: For investigating test-retest reliability, correlation between CNFDS scores, applied at 1-week interval, intraclass correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.86 (95% confidence interval = 0.679-0.935). There was no difference between test-retest scores (P < 0.001). For investigating concurrent validity, correlation between total score of the CNFDS and the mean visual analogue scale was r = 0.73 (P < 0.001). Concurrent validity of the CNFDS was very good. For investigating construct validity, correlation between total score of the CNFDS and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale was r = 0.78 (P < 0.001). Construct validity of the CNFDS was also very good. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the CNFDS is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish people. SN - 1528-1159 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22281488/The_cross_cultural_adaptation_reliability_and_validity_of_the_Copenhagen_Neck_Functional_Disability_Scale_in_patients_with_chronic_neck_pain:_Turkish_version_study_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b549c DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -