Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Cost effectiveness of fracture prevention in postmenopausal women who receive aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 01; 30(13):1468-75.JC

Abstract

PURPOSE

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures in postmenopausal women who receive adjuvant AIs for hormone receptor (HR) -positive early breast cancer (EBC). We compared the cost effectiveness of alternative screening and treatment strategies for fracture prevention.

METHODS

We developed a Markov state transition model to simulate clinical practice and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of women age 60 years with HR-positive EBC starting a 5-year course of AI therapy after primary surgery for breast cancer. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We compared the following strategies: no intervention; one-time bone mineral density (BMD) screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; annual BMD screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; and universal bisphosphonate therapy.

RESULTS

ICERs for annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis, annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteopenia, and universal treatment with oral bisphosphonates were $87,300, $129,300, and $283,600 per QALY gained, respectively. One-time BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis or osteopenia was dominated. Our results were sensitive to age at the initiation of AI therapy, type of bisphosphonates, post-treatment residual effect of bisphosphonates, and a potential adjuvant benefit of intravenous bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AIs for HR-positive EBC, a policy of baseline and annual BMD screening followed by selective treatment with oral bisphosphonates for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of societal resources.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Brigham and Women’sHospital, Boston, MA, USA. kito5@partners.orgNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

22370313

Citation

Ito, Kouta, et al. "Cost Effectiveness of Fracture Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Who Receive Aromatase Inhibitors for Early Breast Cancer." Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 30, no. 13, 2012, pp. 1468-75.
Ito K, Blinder VS, Elkin EB. Cost effectiveness of fracture prevention in postmenopausal women who receive aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(13):1468-75.
Ito, K., Blinder, V. S., & Elkin, E. B. (2012). Cost effectiveness of fracture prevention in postmenopausal women who receive aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 30(13), 1468-75. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7001
Ito K, Blinder VS, Elkin EB. Cost Effectiveness of Fracture Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Who Receive Aromatase Inhibitors for Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1468-75. PubMed PMID: 22370313.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Cost effectiveness of fracture prevention in postmenopausal women who receive aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer. AU - Ito,Kouta, AU - Blinder,Victoria S, AU - Elkin,Elena B, Y1 - 2012/02/27/ PY - 2012/2/29/entrez PY - 2012/3/1/pubmed PY - 2012/6/30/medline SP - 1468 EP - 75 JF - Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology JO - J Clin Oncol VL - 30 IS - 13 N2 - PURPOSE: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures in postmenopausal women who receive adjuvant AIs for hormone receptor (HR) -positive early breast cancer (EBC). We compared the cost effectiveness of alternative screening and treatment strategies for fracture prevention. METHODS: We developed a Markov state transition model to simulate clinical practice and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of women age 60 years with HR-positive EBC starting a 5-year course of AI therapy after primary surgery for breast cancer. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We compared the following strategies: no intervention; one-time bone mineral density (BMD) screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; annual BMD screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; and universal bisphosphonate therapy. RESULTS: ICERs for annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis, annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteopenia, and universal treatment with oral bisphosphonates were $87,300, $129,300, and $283,600 per QALY gained, respectively. One-time BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis or osteopenia was dominated. Our results were sensitive to age at the initiation of AI therapy, type of bisphosphonates, post-treatment residual effect of bisphosphonates, and a potential adjuvant benefit of intravenous bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AIs for HR-positive EBC, a policy of baseline and annual BMD screening followed by selective treatment with oral bisphosphonates for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of societal resources. SN - 1527-7755 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22370313/Cost_effectiveness_of_fracture_prevention_in_postmenopausal_women_who_receive_aromatase_inhibitors_for_early_breast_cancer_ L2 - https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7001?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -