Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[The results of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal layer endoscopic dissection in patients with superficial epithelial neoplasms of stomach and duodenum].
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol 2011; (10):65-72EK

Abstract

AIM OF STUDY

Comparative assessment outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with superficial epithelial lesions (SEL) of stomach and duodenum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study includes 92 patients. The article contains detailed description of patients, superficial epithelial lesions, technique of EMR and ESD and indications for endoscopic procedure.

RESULTS

99 endoscopic operations were performed: EMR--79, ESD--20. The mean operation time, en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate for early gastric cancer were assessed for EMR and ESD and compared in consideration of lesion's size. Comparative evaluation of immediate, short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic resections was performed.

CONCLUSION

ESD provides better en bloc and complete resection rates and minimal local recurrence compared with EMR, but ESD is more time-consuming technique with the same rate of complications.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

rus

PubMed ID

22629703

Citation

Fedorov, E D., et al. "[The Results of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Submucosal Layer Endoscopic Dissection in Patients With Superficial Epithelial Neoplasms of Stomach and Duodenum]." Eksperimental'naia I Klinicheskaia Gastroenterologiia = Experimental & Clinical Gastroenterology, 2011, pp. 65-72.
Fedorov ED, Plakhov RV, Mikhaleva LM, et al. [The results of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal layer endoscopic dissection in patients with superficial epithelial neoplasms of stomach and duodenum]. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2011.
Fedorov, E. D., Plakhov, R. V., Mikhaleva, L. M., Ivanova, E. V., Galkova, Z. V., & Buntseva, O. A. (2011). [The results of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal layer endoscopic dissection in patients with superficial epithelial neoplasms of stomach and duodenum]. Eksperimental'naia I Klinicheskaia Gastroenterologiia = Experimental & Clinical Gastroenterology, (10), pp. 65-72.
Fedorov ED, et al. [The Results of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Submucosal Layer Endoscopic Dissection in Patients With Superficial Epithelial Neoplasms of Stomach and Duodenum]. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2011;(10)65-72. PubMed PMID: 22629703.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [The results of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal layer endoscopic dissection in patients with superficial epithelial neoplasms of stomach and duodenum]. AU - Fedorov,E D, AU - Plakhov,R V, AU - Mikhaleva,L M, AU - Ivanova,E V, AU - Galkova,Z V, AU - Buntseva,O A, PY - 2012/5/29/entrez PY - 2011/1/1/pubmed PY - 2012/6/23/medline SP - 65 EP - 72 JF - Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia = Experimental & clinical gastroenterology JO - Eksp Klin Gastroenterol IS - 10 N2 - AIM OF STUDY: Comparative assessment outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with superficial epithelial lesions (SEL) of stomach and duodenum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study includes 92 patients. The article contains detailed description of patients, superficial epithelial lesions, technique of EMR and ESD and indications for endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: 99 endoscopic operations were performed: EMR--79, ESD--20. The mean operation time, en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate for early gastric cancer were assessed for EMR and ESD and compared in consideration of lesion's size. Comparative evaluation of immediate, short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic resections was performed. CONCLUSION: ESD provides better en bloc and complete resection rates and minimal local recurrence compared with EMR, but ESD is more time-consuming technique with the same rate of complications. SN - 1682-8658 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22629703/[The_results_of_endoscopic_mucosal_resection_and_submucosal_layer_endoscopic_dissection_in_patients_with_superficial_epithelial_neoplasms_of_stomach_and_duodenum]_ L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/intestinalcancer.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -