Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The role of attentional focus in plyometric training.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Jun; 52(3):319-27.JS

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to examine how focusing attention during nine weeks of plyometric training influence jumping performance. It was hypothesized that participants utilizing an external focus of attention during practice would produce greater improvements in jumping behavior compared to participants practicing in the internal and control conditions.

METHODS

Thirty-six untrained but physically active male college students were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 plyometric groups with a different focus of attention: external (EXF; N.=12), internal (INF; N.=12), and control (CON; N.=12). All participants subsequently participated in the same an 9-week periodized training program. Standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) were tested pre- and posttraining intervention.

RESULTS

The EXF group exhibited greater improvement (P<0.05) in jumping distance for SLJ and height for CMJ than both the INF and CON groups, while the enhancement in jumping height for DJ was not superior (P<0.05) in the EXF group in comparison with the INF and CON groups. However, the CON group showed a greater increase (P<0.05) in jumping height for DJ than the INF group. The EXF group increased the range of knee flexion (KF), whereas both the INF and CON groups decreased the KF during the CMJ. Additionally, only the CON group reduced KF during the execution of the DJ. The EXF group (P<0.05) increased contact time, whereas both the INF and CON groups decreased (P<0.05) contact time in DJ. The EXF group had significantly (P<0.05) greater vertical ground reaction force in CMJ and DJ when compared with the INF and CON groups.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the external focus of attention during plyometric training may provide a greater stimulus to jump performance in slow stretch shortening cycle (SSC) tasks by producing greater force than adopting the internal and no specific focus.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Athletics, The Josef Pilsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland. hubert.makaruk@awf-bp.edu.plNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

22648471

Citation

Makaruk, H, et al. "The Role of Attentional Focus in Plyometric Training." The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, vol. 52, no. 3, 2012, pp. 319-27.
Makaruk H, Porter JM, Czaplicki A, et al. The role of attentional focus in plyometric training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012;52(3):319-27.
Makaruk, H., Porter, J. M., Czaplicki, A., Sadowski, J., & Sacewicz, T. (2012). The role of attentional focus in plyometric training. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 52(3), 319-27.
Makaruk H, et al. The Role of Attentional Focus in Plyometric Training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012;52(3):319-27. PubMed PMID: 22648471.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The role of attentional focus in plyometric training. AU - Makaruk,H, AU - Porter,J M, AU - Czaplicki,A, AU - Sadowski,J, AU - Sacewicz,T, PY - 2012/6/1/entrez PY - 2012/6/1/pubmed PY - 2012/9/21/medline SP - 319 EP - 27 JF - The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness JO - J Sports Med Phys Fitness VL - 52 IS - 3 N2 - AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine how focusing attention during nine weeks of plyometric training influence jumping performance. It was hypothesized that participants utilizing an external focus of attention during practice would produce greater improvements in jumping behavior compared to participants practicing in the internal and control conditions. METHODS: Thirty-six untrained but physically active male college students were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 plyometric groups with a different focus of attention: external (EXF; N.=12), internal (INF; N.=12), and control (CON; N.=12). All participants subsequently participated in the same an 9-week periodized training program. Standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) were tested pre- and posttraining intervention. RESULTS: The EXF group exhibited greater improvement (P<0.05) in jumping distance for SLJ and height for CMJ than both the INF and CON groups, while the enhancement in jumping height for DJ was not superior (P<0.05) in the EXF group in comparison with the INF and CON groups. However, the CON group showed a greater increase (P<0.05) in jumping height for DJ than the INF group. The EXF group increased the range of knee flexion (KF), whereas both the INF and CON groups decreased the KF during the CMJ. Additionally, only the CON group reduced KF during the execution of the DJ. The EXF group (P<0.05) increased contact time, whereas both the INF and CON groups decreased (P<0.05) contact time in DJ. The EXF group had significantly (P<0.05) greater vertical ground reaction force in CMJ and DJ when compared with the INF and CON groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the external focus of attention during plyometric training may provide a greater stimulus to jump performance in slow stretch shortening cycle (SSC) tasks by producing greater force than adopting the internal and no specific focus. SN - 0022-4707 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22648471/The_role_of_attentional_focus_in_plyometric_training_ L2 - http://www.minervamedica.it/index2.t?show=R40Y2012N03A0319 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -