Citation
Hicks, Sarah, et al. "Evaluating Community-based Participatory Research to Improve Community-partnered Science and Community Health." Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, vol. 6, no. 3, 2012, pp. 289-99.
Hicks S, Duran B, Wallerstein N, et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6(3):289-99.
Hicks, S., Duran, B., Wallerstein, N., Avila, M., Belone, L., Lucero, J., Magarati, M., Mainer, E., Martin, D., Muhammad, M., Oetzel, J., Pearson, C., Sahota, P., Simonds, V., Sussman, A., Tafoya, G., & Hat, E. W. (2012). Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 6(3), 289-99. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0049
Hicks S, et al. Evaluating Community-based Participatory Research to Improve Community-partnered Science and Community Health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6(3):289-99. PubMed PMID: 22982842.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.
AU - Hicks,Sarah,
AU - Duran,Bonnie,
AU - Wallerstein,Nina,
AU - Avila,Magdalena,
AU - Belone,Lorenda,
AU - Lucero,Julie,
AU - Magarati,Maya,
AU - Mainer,Elana,
AU - Martin,Diane,
AU - Muhammad,Michael,
AU - Oetzel,John,
AU - Pearson,Cynthia,
AU - Sahota,Puneet,
AU - Simonds,Vanessa,
AU - Sussman,Andrew,
AU - Tafoya,Greg,
AU - Hat,Emily White,
PY - 2012/9/18/entrez
PY - 2012/9/18/pubmed
PY - 2012/10/25/medline
SP - 289
EP - 99
JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
JO - Prog Community Health Partnersh
VL - 6
IS - 3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Since 2007, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center (PRC) has partnered with the Universities of New Mexico and Washington to study the science of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Our goal is to identify facilitators and barriers to effective community-academic partnerships in American Indian and other communities, which face health disparities. OBJECTIVES: We have described herein the scientific design of our National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study (2009-2013) and lessons learned by having a strong community partner leading the research efforts. METHODS: The research team is implementing a mixed-methods study involving a survey of principal investigators (PIs) and partners across the nation and in-depth case studies of CBPR projects. RESULTS: We present preliminary findings on methods and measures for community-engaged research and eight lessons learned thus far regarding partnership evaluation, advisory councils, historical trust, research capacity development of community partner, advocacy, honoring each other, messaging, and funding. CONCLUSIONS: Study methodologies and lessons learned can help community-academic research partnerships translate research in communities.
SN - 1557-0541
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/22982842/Evaluating_community_based_participatory_research_to_improve_community_partnered_science_and_community_health_
L2 - http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/resolve_openurl.cgi?issn=1557-0541&volume=6&issue=3&spage=289&aulast=Hicks
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
