Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.
Angle Orthod. 2013 May; 83(3):460-7.AO

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Miniscrew Implant Supported Distalization System (MISDS) and the Bone-Anchored Pendulum Appliance (BAPA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 28 patients displaying Angle Class II malocclusion, 14 patients with a mean age of 14.8 ± 3.6 years treated with MISDS were included in the first group, and 14 patients with a mean age of 14.5 ± 1.5 years treated with BAPA were included in the second group. The pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed. Statistical evaluation was carried out using the paired Shapiro-Wilk test, the paired-sample t-test, and the unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

Upper posterior teeth were distalized successfully in both groups. Nearly bodily distalization was seen in the MISDS group, whereas significant distal tipping of the upper first molars was observed in the BAPA group (P < .001). There were no statistically significant changes in the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible and in the position of the upper incisors as a result of treatment in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods provided absolute anchorage for distalization of posterior teeth; however, almost translatory distal movement was encountered in the MISDS group, and substantial distal tipping of the maxillary molars accompanied distalization in the BAPA group.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Başkent University, Bahcelievler-Ankara 06490, Turkey. caglasar@yahoo.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23106546

Citation

Sar, Cagla, et al. "Comparison of Two Implant-supported Molar Distalization Systems." The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 83, no. 3, 2013, pp. 460-7.
Sar C, Kaya B, Ozsoy O, et al. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(3):460-7.
Sar, C., Kaya, B., Ozsoy, O., & Özcirpici, A. A. (2013). Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. The Angle Orthodontist, 83(3), 460-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/080512-630.1
Sar C, et al. Comparison of Two Implant-supported Molar Distalization Systems. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(3):460-7. PubMed PMID: 23106546.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. AU - Sar,Cagla, AU - Kaya,Burcak, AU - Ozsoy,Omur, AU - Özcirpici,Ayca Arman, Y1 - 2012/10/29/ PY - 2012/10/31/entrez PY - 2012/10/31/pubmed PY - 2013/10/29/medline SP - 460 EP - 7 JF - The Angle orthodontist JO - Angle Orthod VL - 83 IS - 3 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Miniscrew Implant Supported Distalization System (MISDS) and the Bone-Anchored Pendulum Appliance (BAPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 28 patients displaying Angle Class II malocclusion, 14 patients with a mean age of 14.8 ± 3.6 years treated with MISDS were included in the first group, and 14 patients with a mean age of 14.5 ± 1.5 years treated with BAPA were included in the second group. The pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed. Statistical evaluation was carried out using the paired Shapiro-Wilk test, the paired-sample t-test, and the unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Upper posterior teeth were distalized successfully in both groups. Nearly bodily distalization was seen in the MISDS group, whereas significant distal tipping of the upper first molars was observed in the BAPA group (P < .001). There were no statistically significant changes in the sagittal position of the maxilla and mandible and in the position of the upper incisors as a result of treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods provided absolute anchorage for distalization of posterior teeth; however, almost translatory distal movement was encountered in the MISDS group, and substantial distal tipping of the maxillary molars accompanied distalization in the BAPA group. SN - 1945-7103 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23106546/Comparison_of_two_implant_supported_molar_distalization_systems_ L2 - https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article-lookup/doi/10.2319/080512-630.1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -