Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Clinical characteristics of a novel subgroup of chronic fatigue syndrome patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.
J Intern Med. 2013 May; 273(5):501-10.JI

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A significant proportion of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) also have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We aimed to characterize these patients and differentiate them from CFS patients without POTS in terms of clinical and autonomic features.

METHODS

A total of 179 patients with CFS (1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) attending one of the largest Department of Health-funded CFS clinical services were included in this study. Outcome measures were as follows: (i) symptom assessment tools including the fatigue impact scale, Chalder fatigue scale, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), orthostatic grading scale (OGS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-A and -D, respectively), (ii) autonomic function analysis including heart rate variability and (iii) haemodynamic responses including left ventricular ejection time and systolic blood pressure drop upon standing.

RESULTS

CFS patients with POTS (13%, n = 24) were younger (29 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 13 years, P < 0.0001), less fatigued (Chalder fatigue scale, 8 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 2, P = 0.002), less depressed (HADS-D, 6 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 4, P = 0.01) and had reduced daytime hypersomnolence (ESS, 7 ± 6 vs. 10 ± 5, P = 0.02), compared with patients without POTS. In addition, they exhibited greater orthostatic intolerance (OGS, 11 ± 5; P < 0.0001) and autonomic dysfunction. A combined clinical assessment tool of ESS ≤9 and OGS ≥9 identifies accurately CFS patients with POTS with 100% positive and negative predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of POTS marks a distinct clinical group of CFS patents, with phenotypic features differentiating them from those without POTS. A combination of validated clinical assessment tools can determine which CFS patients have POTS with a high degree of accuracy, and thus potentially identify those who require further investigation and consideration for therapy to control heart rate.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute for Ageing & Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23206180

Citation

Lewis, I, et al. "Clinical Characteristics of a Novel Subgroup of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients With Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome." Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 273, no. 5, 2013, pp. 501-10.
Lewis I, Pairman J, Spickett G, et al. Clinical characteristics of a novel subgroup of chronic fatigue syndrome patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. J Intern Med. 2013;273(5):501-10.
Lewis, I., Pairman, J., Spickett, G., & Newton, J. L. (2013). Clinical characteristics of a novel subgroup of chronic fatigue syndrome patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Journal of Internal Medicine, 273(5), 501-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12022
Lewis I, et al. Clinical Characteristics of a Novel Subgroup of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients With Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome. J Intern Med. 2013;273(5):501-10. PubMed PMID: 23206180.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Clinical characteristics of a novel subgroup of chronic fatigue syndrome patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. AU - Lewis,I, AU - Pairman,J, AU - Spickett,G, AU - Newton,J L, Y1 - 2013/01/07/ PY - 2012/12/5/entrez PY - 2012/12/5/pubmed PY - 2013/7/3/medline SP - 501 EP - 10 JF - Journal of internal medicine JO - J Intern Med VL - 273 IS - 5 N2 - OBJECTIVES: A significant proportion of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) also have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We aimed to characterize these patients and differentiate them from CFS patients without POTS in terms of clinical and autonomic features. METHODS: A total of 179 patients with CFS (1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) attending one of the largest Department of Health-funded CFS clinical services were included in this study. Outcome measures were as follows: (i) symptom assessment tools including the fatigue impact scale, Chalder fatigue scale, Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), orthostatic grading scale (OGS) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS-A and -D, respectively), (ii) autonomic function analysis including heart rate variability and (iii) haemodynamic responses including left ventricular ejection time and systolic blood pressure drop upon standing. RESULTS: CFS patients with POTS (13%, n = 24) were younger (29 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 13 years, P < 0.0001), less fatigued (Chalder fatigue scale, 8 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 2, P = 0.002), less depressed (HADS-D, 6 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 4, P = 0.01) and had reduced daytime hypersomnolence (ESS, 7 ± 6 vs. 10 ± 5, P = 0.02), compared with patients without POTS. In addition, they exhibited greater orthostatic intolerance (OGS, 11 ± 5; P < 0.0001) and autonomic dysfunction. A combined clinical assessment tool of ESS ≤9 and OGS ≥9 identifies accurately CFS patients with POTS with 100% positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of POTS marks a distinct clinical group of CFS patents, with phenotypic features differentiating them from those without POTS. A combination of validated clinical assessment tools can determine which CFS patients have POTS with a high degree of accuracy, and thus potentially identify those who require further investigation and consideration for therapy to control heart rate. SN - 1365-2796 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23206180/Clinical_characteristics_of_a_novel_subgroup_of_chronic_fatigue_syndrome_patients_with_postural_orthostatic_tachycardia_syndrome_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12022 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -