Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis - an inter-rater study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 06; 13:242.BM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength is fundamental in the clinical diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) but reproducibility of these measurements has mostly involved clinicians from secondary care and has rarely reported agreement parameters. Therefore, the primary objective of the study was to determine the inter-rater reproducibility of ROM and muscle strength measurements. Furthermore, the reliability of the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was evaluated. Reporting is in accordance with proposed guidelines for the reporting of reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS).

METHODS

In a university hospital, four blinded raters independently examined patients with unilateral hip OA; two hospital orthopaedists independently examined 48 (24 men) patients and two primary care chiropractors examined 61 patients (29 men). ROM was measured in degrees (deg.) with a standard two-arm goniometer and muscle strength in Newton (N) using a hand-held dynamometer. Reproducibility is reported as agreement and reliability between paired raters of the same profession. Agreement is reported as limits of agreement (LoA) and reliability is reported with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reliability of the overall assessment of clinical OA is reported as weighted kappa.

RESULTS

Between orthopaedists, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-28-12 deg.] for internal rotation to [-8-13 deg.] for extension. ICC ranged between 0.53 and 0.73, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between orthopaedists, LoA ranged from [-65-47N] for external rotation to [-10 -59N] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.52 and 0.85, highest for abduction. Between chiropractors, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-25-30 deg.] for internal rotation to [-13-21 deg.] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.14 and 0.79, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between chiropractors, LoA ranged between [-80-20N] for external rotation to [-146-55N] for abduction. ICC ranged between 0.38 and 0.81, highest for flexion. Weighted kappa for the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was 0.52 between orthopaedists and 0.65 between chiropractors.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of goniometric and dynamometric measurements of ROM and muscle strength in patients with hip OA is poor between experienced orthopaedists and between experienced chiropractors. Orthopaedists and chiropractors can to a moderate degree differentiate between hips with or without osteoarthritis.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. e.poulsen@nikkb.dkNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23217149

Citation

Poulsen, Erik, et al. "Reproducibility of Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Measurements in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis - an Inter-rater Study." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 13, 2012, p. 242.
Poulsen E, Christensen HW, Penny JØ, et al. Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis - an inter-rater study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:242.
Poulsen, E., Christensen, H. W., Penny, J. Ø., Overgaard, S., Vach, W., & Hartvigsen, J. (2012). Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis - an inter-rater study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13, 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-242
Poulsen E, et al. Reproducibility of Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Measurements in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis - an Inter-rater Study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 6;13:242. PubMed PMID: 23217149.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis - an inter-rater study. AU - Poulsen,Erik, AU - Christensen,Henrik Wulff, AU - Penny,Jeannette Østergaard, AU - Overgaard,Søren, AU - Vach,Werner, AU - Hartvigsen,Jan, Y1 - 2012/12/06/ PY - 2012/03/14/received PY - 2012/11/30/accepted PY - 2012/12/11/entrez PY - 2012/12/12/pubmed PY - 2013/6/13/medline SP - 242 EP - 242 JF - BMC musculoskeletal disorders JO - BMC Musculoskelet Disord VL - 13 N2 - BACKGROUND: Assessment of range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength is fundamental in the clinical diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) but reproducibility of these measurements has mostly involved clinicians from secondary care and has rarely reported agreement parameters. Therefore, the primary objective of the study was to determine the inter-rater reproducibility of ROM and muscle strength measurements. Furthermore, the reliability of the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was evaluated. Reporting is in accordance with proposed guidelines for the reporting of reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). METHODS: In a university hospital, four blinded raters independently examined patients with unilateral hip OA; two hospital orthopaedists independently examined 48 (24 men) patients and two primary care chiropractors examined 61 patients (29 men). ROM was measured in degrees (deg.) with a standard two-arm goniometer and muscle strength in Newton (N) using a hand-held dynamometer. Reproducibility is reported as agreement and reliability between paired raters of the same profession. Agreement is reported as limits of agreement (LoA) and reliability is reported with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reliability of the overall assessment of clinical OA is reported as weighted kappa. RESULTS: Between orthopaedists, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-28-12 deg.] for internal rotation to [-8-13 deg.] for extension. ICC ranged between 0.53 and 0.73, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between orthopaedists, LoA ranged from [-65-47N] for external rotation to [-10 -59N] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.52 and 0.85, highest for abduction. Between chiropractors, agreement for ROM ranged from LoA [-25-30 deg.] for internal rotation to [-13-21 deg.] for flexion. ICC ranged between 0.14 and 0.79, highest for flexion. For muscle strength between chiropractors, LoA ranged between [-80-20N] for external rotation to [-146-55N] for abduction. ICC ranged between 0.38 and 0.81, highest for flexion. Weighted kappa for the overall assessment of clinical hip OA was 0.52 between orthopaedists and 0.65 between chiropractors. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of goniometric and dynamometric measurements of ROM and muscle strength in patients with hip OA is poor between experienced orthopaedists and between experienced chiropractors. Orthopaedists and chiropractors can to a moderate degree differentiate between hips with or without osteoarthritis. SN - 1471-2474 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23217149/Reproducibility_of_range_of_motion_and_muscle_strength_measurements_in_patients_with_hip_osteoarthritis___an_inter_rater_study_ L2 - https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2474-13-242 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -