Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
J Prosthodont. 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74.JP

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether the tubular occluding effect of oxalate desensitizer (OX) during adhesive cementation (three resin cements) influenced fracture resistance of teeth restored with adhesive inlays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into 9 groups of 10 each. The two control groups were Gr 1, intact teeth and Gr 2, mesio-occlusodistal preparation only. In six experimental groups, the composite inlays were cemented with ED Primer II/Panavia F 2.0, Excite DSC/Variolink II, and One-Step Plus/Duolink according to manufacturers' instructions (Groups 3, 5, and 7, respectively) or with OX during cementation (Groups 4, 6, and 8, respectively). In Group 9, inlays were cemented with a resin cement without adhesive system. After thermocycling, fracture strength was tested. The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Fracture resistance of the six groups were significantly affected by OX (p = 0.002) but not by the resin cement type (p > 0.05). The interaction of the two factors was statistically significant (p = 0.052). A statistically significant difference between all groups was found (p < 0.001). The mean fracture resistances (N) were: Gr1 = 1168 ± 157,(a) Gr2 = 360 ± 110,(d) Gr3 = 1026 ± 188,(b) Gr4 = 887 ± 143,(c) Gr5 = 1007 ± 132,(b) Gr6 = 810 ± 164,(c) Gr7 = 1033 ± 218,(a) Gr8 = 955 ± 147,(ab) Gr9 = 780 ± 86(c) (groups with the same superscript letter indicate statistical similarity).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining an OX with three resin cements had a significant negative effect on the fracture resistance of premolars restored with composite inlay cemented with Panavia F2.0 and Variolink II, but it had no significant effect when cemented with Duolink.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23279061

Citation

Shafiei, Fereshteh, et al. "Effects of Oxalate Desensitizer With Different Resin Cement-retained Indirect Composite Inlays On Fracture Resistance of Teeth." Journal of Prosthodontics : Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, vol. 22, no. 4, 2013, pp. 268-74.
Shafiei F, Alavi AA, Karimi F, et al. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(4):268-74.
Shafiei, F., Alavi, A. A., Karimi, F., & Ansarifard, E. (2013). Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Journal of Prosthodontics : Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 22(4), 268-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00947.x
Shafiei F, et al. Effects of Oxalate Desensitizer With Different Resin Cement-retained Indirect Composite Inlays On Fracture Resistance of Teeth. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(4):268-74. PubMed PMID: 23279061.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. AU - Shafiei,Fereshteh, AU - Alavi,Ali Asghar, AU - Karimi,Fatemeh, AU - Ansarifard,Elham, Y1 - 2012/12/20/ PY - 2012/08/26/accepted PY - 2013/1/3/entrez PY - 2013/1/3/pubmed PY - 2014/7/26/medline SP - 268 EP - 74 JF - Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists JO - J Prosthodont VL - 22 IS - 4 N2 - PURPOSE: This study investigated whether the tubular occluding effect of oxalate desensitizer (OX) during adhesive cementation (three resin cements) influenced fracture resistance of teeth restored with adhesive inlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into 9 groups of 10 each. The two control groups were Gr 1, intact teeth and Gr 2, mesio-occlusodistal preparation only. In six experimental groups, the composite inlays were cemented with ED Primer II/Panavia F 2.0, Excite DSC/Variolink II, and One-Step Plus/Duolink according to manufacturers' instructions (Groups 3, 5, and 7, respectively) or with OX during cementation (Groups 4, 6, and 8, respectively). In Group 9, inlays were cemented with a resin cement without adhesive system. After thermocycling, fracture strength was tested. The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Fracture resistance of the six groups were significantly affected by OX (p = 0.002) but not by the resin cement type (p > 0.05). The interaction of the two factors was statistically significant (p = 0.052). A statistically significant difference between all groups was found (p < 0.001). The mean fracture resistances (N) were: Gr1 = 1168 ± 157,(a) Gr2 = 360 ± 110,(d) Gr3 = 1026 ± 188,(b) Gr4 = 887 ± 143,(c) Gr5 = 1007 ± 132,(b) Gr6 = 810 ± 164,(c) Gr7 = 1033 ± 218,(a) Gr8 = 955 ± 147,(ab) Gr9 = 780 ± 86(c) (groups with the same superscript letter indicate statistical similarity). CONCLUSIONS: Combining an OX with three resin cements had a significant negative effect on the fracture resistance of premolars restored with composite inlay cemented with Panavia F2.0 and Variolink II, but it had no significant effect when cemented with Duolink. SN - 1532-849X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23279061/Effects_of_oxalate_desensitizer_with_different_resin_cement_retained_indirect_composite_inlays_on_fracture_resistance_of_teeth_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00947.x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -