Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb; 8(1):20-31.JE

Abstract

When community partners have direct interaction with human research participants, it is important to consider potential threats to participant protections and research integrity. Few studies have directly compared the views of academic and community partners. This pilot focus group study explores the views of academic partners (APs) and community partners (CPs) regarding challenges to the protection of research participants and research integrity in community-engaged research (CEnR). Data are analyzed to understand how APs and CPs define and think about ethical problems and how meaning and analysis may differ between the two groups. Findings have implications for the development of research ethics training materials for academic-community research partnerships and IRBs; best practices for CEnR; and future research on ethical issues in CEnR.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, USA. emanderson@lumc.edu

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23485668

Citation

Anderson, Emily E.. "Views of Academic and Community Partners Regarding Participant Protections and Research Integrity: a Pilot Focus Group Study." Journal of Empirical Research On Human Research Ethics : JERHRE, vol. 8, no. 1, 2013, pp. 20-31.
Anderson EE. Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013;8(1):20-31.
Anderson, E. E. (2013). Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study. Journal of Empirical Research On Human Research Ethics : JERHRE, 8(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.20
Anderson EE. Views of Academic and Community Partners Regarding Participant Protections and Research Integrity: a Pilot Focus Group Study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013;8(1):20-31. PubMed PMID: 23485668.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study. A1 - Anderson,Emily E, PY - 2013/3/15/entrez PY - 2013/3/15/pubmed PY - 2013/8/27/medline SP - 20 EP - 31 JF - Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE JO - J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics VL - 8 IS - 1 N2 - When community partners have direct interaction with human research participants, it is important to consider potential threats to participant protections and research integrity. Few studies have directly compared the views of academic and community partners. This pilot focus group study explores the views of academic partners (APs) and community partners (CPs) regarding challenges to the protection of research participants and research integrity in community-engaged research (CEnR). Data are analyzed to understand how APs and CPs define and think about ethical problems and how meaning and analysis may differ between the two groups. Findings have implications for the development of research ethics training materials for academic-community research partnerships and IRBs; best practices for CEnR; and future research on ethical issues in CEnR. SN - 1556-2654 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23485668/Views_of_academic_and_community_partners_regarding_participant_protections_and_research_integrity:_a_pilot_focus_group_study_ L2 - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.20?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -